* Satoru Takeuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are welcome. I can use larger machine by chance, and also tested
> there just now.
>
> Test environment
>
>
> - kernel: 2.6.21-rc6-CFS
> - run time: 300 secs
> - # of CPU: 12
> - # of processes: 200 or
At Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:47:25 +0200,
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>
> * Satoru Takeuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > btw., other schedulers might work better with some more test-time:
> > > i'd suggest to use 60 seconds (./massive_intr 10 60) [or maybe more,
> > > using more threads] to see long-
* Satoru Takeuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > btw., other schedulers might work better with some more test-time:
> > i'd suggest to use 60 seconds (./massive_intr 10 60) [or maybe more,
> > using more threads] to see long-term fairness effects.
>
> I tested CFS with massive_intr. I did long
At Sat, 14 Apr 2007 14:02:20 +0200,
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo,
> > Did a test with massive_intr.c on a standard linux desktop.
> > for vanilla, con's Sd-0.40 and cfs.
>
> thanks!
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$ ./massive_intr 10 10
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:02:20PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> cool. ringtest.c is intended to be used the following way: start it, it
> will generate a 99% busy system (but it is using a ring of 100 tasks,
> where each tasks runs for 100 msecs then sleeps for 1 msec, so every
> task gets a turn
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
> Did a test with massive_intr.c on a standard linux desktop.
> for vanilla, con's Sd-0.40 and cfs.
thanks!
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$ ./massive_intr 10 10
> 002435 0120
> 002439 0120
> 002441 0120
> 002434 0120
>
Hi Surya,
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:19:06PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
thanks for the interesting results.
> cpu time is very very close to being fair in cfs. Will be trying out
> ringtest in the next round.
It looks like Ingo can do very good things, he just needs very strong
compe
Hi Ingo,
Did a test with massive_intr.c on a standard linux desktop.
for vanilla, con's Sd-0.40 and cfs.
Test bed is a p4 2.26GHz, 512mb ram
No load on the machine expect for the X server.
Results are stated below
Vanilla Kernel
2.6.21-rc6-vanilla #8 SMP Sat Apr 14
[EMA
8 matches
Mail list logo
