On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:05:21 -0400ve a bit more direct ability to make
> An SPI-like or Debian-like approach with pure democracy might look
> good on paper, but when you have companies donating hundreds of
> thousands of dollars and up to the organization, having a board which
> is elected by mobs
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:49:57PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> Then you're misconstruing the interactions. A representational role
> would imply the ability to speak for the community and make promises on
> its behalf. That, as Ted has already said, can't happen. Instead, the
> value to the
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:49:57PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
Then you're misconstruing the interactions. A representational role
would imply the ability to speak for the community and make promises on
its behalf. That, as Ted has already said, can't happen. Instead, the
value to the LF
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:05:21 -0400ve a bit more direct ability to make
An SPI-like or Debian-like approach with pure democracy might look
good on paper, but when you have companies donating hundreds of
thousands of dollars and up to the organization, having a board which
is elected by mobs of
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 19:45 -0700, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> > community. This was especially true the first year before the TAB was
> > elected; but even after we held an election at last year's KS, I think
> > it's fair to say that while we try to
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
> community. This was especially true the first year before the TAB was
> elected; but even after we held an election at last year's KS, I think
> it's fair to say that while we try to advise the OSDL and now the LF
> with what the community would like,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 05:14:26PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> It's really just a represent the community type of role. The LF uses
> the TAB to get a sense of the community for various things they and
> their members are thinking. Conversely, the TAB was initially formed to
> get a set of
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 16:47 -0700, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > The procedure is to read statements before the election in a BOF at the
> > Kernel Summit, so the order is statements first then voting.
>
> Just to clarify, are sponsor delegates and KS
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> The procedure is to read statements before the election in a BOF at the
> Kernel Summit, so the order is statements first then voting.
Just to clarify, are sponsor delegates and KS committee members entitled
to vote?
- James
--
James Morris
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 17:58 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:43:58PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> > > > Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
> > > > election will be
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:43:58PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> > > Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
> > > election will be at the 2007 Kernel Summit in a BOF session.
> > >
> > >
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 14:38 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:33:58 -0700 Chris Wright wrote:
>
> > * Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I have a reservation about voting for any of the above.
> > > Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort
> >
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 17:22 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:22:59AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> > Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
> > election will be at the
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:33:58 -0700 Chris Wright wrote:
> * Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I have a reservation about voting for any of the above.
> > Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort
> > of "why you should vote for me" type statement. Does such a
* Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have a reservation about voting for any of the above.
> Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort
> of "why you should vote for me" type statement. Does such a thing
> exist for this process ?
Last year each nominee made a
* Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have a reservation about voting for any of the above.
Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort
of why you should vote for me type statement. Does such a thing
exist for this process ?
Last year each nominee made a statement
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:33:58 -0700 Chris Wright wrote:
* Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have a reservation about voting for any of the above.
Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort
of why you should vote for me type statement. Does such a thing
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 17:22 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
removed [EMAIL PROTECTED] as its subscriber only
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:22:59AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year,
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 14:38 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:33:58 -0700 Chris Wright wrote:
* Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have a reservation about voting for any of the above.
Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort
of why you
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:43:58PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
election will be at the 2007 Kernel Summit in a BOF session.
Anyone is
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 17:58 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:43:58PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
election will be at the 2007
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
The procedure is to read statements before the election in a BOF at the
Kernel Summit, so the order is statements first then voting.
Just to clarify, are sponsor delegates and KS committee members entitled
to vote?
- James
--
James Morris
[EMAIL
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 16:47 -0700, James Morris wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
The procedure is to read statements before the election in a BOF at the
Kernel Summit, so the order is statements first then voting.
Just to clarify, are sponsor delegates and KS committee
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 05:14:26PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
It's really just a represent the community type of role. The LF uses
the TAB to get a sense of the community for various things they and
their members are thinking. Conversely, the TAB was initially formed to
get a set of
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
community. This was especially true the first year before the TAB was
elected; but even after we held an election at last year's KS, I think
it's fair to say that while we try to advise the OSDL and now the LF
with what the community would like, the
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 19:45 -0700, James Morris wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
community. This was especially true the first year before the TAB was
elected; but even after we held an election at last year's KS, I think
it's fair to say that while we try to advise the
26 matches
Mail list logo
