On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 12:27:10AM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> It's getting very lonely testing this stuff. It would be useful if
> someone else could help out - at least running the bw_tcp tests. It's
> pretty simple:
>
> bw_tcp -s ; bw_tcp 0
OK, here's my bw_tcp results on a K6-2
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton writes:
> > Changing the memory copy function did make some difference
> > in my setup. But the performance drop on send(8k) is only approx 10%,
> > partly because I changed the way I'm testing it - `cyclesoak' is
> > now penalised more heavily by
"David S. Miller" wrote:
Andrew Morton writes:
Changing the memory copy function did make some difference
in my setup. But the performance drop on send(8k) is only approx 10%,
partly because I changed the way I'm testing it - `cyclesoak' is
now penalised more heavily by cache
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 12:27:10AM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
It's getting very lonely testing this stuff. It would be useful if
someone else could help out - at least running the bw_tcp tests. It's
pretty simple:
bw_tcp -s ; bw_tcp 0
OK, here's my bw_tcp results on a K6-2 450. I
Andrew Morton writes:
> Changing the memory copy function did make some difference
> in my setup. But the performance drop on send(8k) is only approx 10%,
> partly because I changed the way I'm testing it - `cyclesoak' is
> now penalised more heavily by cache misses, and amount of cache
>
Andrew Morton writes:
Changing the memory copy function did make some difference
in my setup. But the performance drop on send(8k) is only approx 10%,
partly because I changed the way I'm testing it - `cyclesoak' is
now penalised more heavily by cache misses, and amount of cache
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> As usual:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.2p2-1.diff.gz
>
> It's updated to be against the latest (2.4.2-pre2) and I've removed
> the non-zerocopy related fixes from the patch (because I've sent them
> under seperate cover to
"David S. Miller" wrote:
As usual:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.2p2-1.diff.gz
It's updated to be against the latest (2.4.2-pre2) and I've removed
the non-zerocopy related fixes from the patch (because I've sent them
under seperate cover to Linus).
As usual:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.2p2-1.diff.gz
It's updated to be against the latest (2.4.2-pre2) and I've removed
the non-zerocopy related fixes from the patch (because I've sent them
under seperate cover to Linus).
Enjoy. As usual, I am very
As usual:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.2p2-1.diff.gz
It's updated to be against the latest (2.4.2-pre2) and I've removed
the non-zerocopy related fixes from the patch (because I've sent them
under seperate cover to Linus).
Enjoy. As usual, I am very
10 matches
Mail list logo