Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Description: The current sys_poll() implementation does not seem to
> handle large timeouts correctly. Any value in milliseconds (@timeout)
> which exceeds the maximum representable jiffy value
> (MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT) should result in a
On 06.09.2005 [14:25:14 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 31.08.2005 [13:01:09 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > Sorry everybody, forgot the most important Cc: :)
> >
> > -Nish
> >
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > In looking at Bug 5132 and sys_poll(), I think there is a flaw in the
> >
On 06.09.2005 [14:25:14 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 31.08.2005 [13:01:09 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
Sorry everybody, forgot the most important Cc: :)
-Nish
Hi Andrew,
In looking at Bug 5132 and sys_poll(), I think there is a flaw in the
current code.
The
Nishanth Aravamudan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Description: The current sys_poll() implementation does not seem to
handle large timeouts correctly. Any value in milliseconds (@timeout)
which exceeds the maximum representable jiffy value
(MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT) should result in a
4 matches
Mail list logo