Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()

2007-11-07 Thread Erez Zadok
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Albrecht writes: > On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 15:04 +, David Howells wrote: > > Paul Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Does your test set include readahead-list? I can't get it to work with a > > > union mounted filesystem without segfault'ing and

Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()

2007-11-07 Thread David Howells
Paul Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Without ... what's the difference? I asked a specific question about the > test set that was used to validate unionfs and your fix. I was just checking it wasn't something my patch introduced. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()

2007-11-07 Thread Paul Albrecht
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 15:04 +, David Howells wrote: > Paul Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does your test set include readahead-list? I can't get it to work with a > > union mounted filesystem without segfault'ing and kernel oops'ing. > > Is that with or without this patch?

Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()

2007-11-07 Thread David Howells
Paul Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does your test set include readahead-list? I can't get it to work with a > union mounted filesystem without segfault'ing and kernel oops'ing. Is that with or without this patch? David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()

2007-11-07 Thread Paul Albrecht
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 01:44 -0500, Erez Zadok wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Howells writes: > > From: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Stop the UnionFS filesystem from using iget() and read_inode(). Replace > > unionfs_read_inode() with unionfs_iget(), and call that

Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()

2007-11-07 Thread David Howells
Paul Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Without ... what's the difference? I asked a specific question about the test set that was used to validate unionfs and your fix. I was just checking it wasn't something my patch introduced. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()

2007-11-07 Thread David Howells
Paul Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does your test set include readahead-list? I can't get it to work with a union mounted filesystem without segfault'ing and kernel oops'ing. Is that with or without this patch? David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel

Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()

2007-11-07 Thread Paul Albrecht
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 15:04 +, David Howells wrote: Paul Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does your test set include readahead-list? I can't get it to work with a union mounted filesystem without segfault'ing and kernel oops'ing. Is that with or without this patch? Without ...

Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()

2007-11-07 Thread Paul Albrecht
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 01:44 -0500, Erez Zadok wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Howells writes: From: David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stop the UnionFS filesystem from using iget() and read_inode(). Replace unionfs_read_inode() with unionfs_iget(), and call that instead of

Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()

2007-11-07 Thread Erez Zadok
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Albrecht writes: On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 15:04 +, David Howells wrote: Paul Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does your test set include readahead-list? I can't get it to work with a union mounted filesystem without segfault'ing and kernel oops'ing.