On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:09:27 -0700
Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 06:41:40 +0200
> Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 07:46:56PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > > Intel doesn't have EFER.NX bit.
> >
> > Of course it does.
> >
>
> Right, it does. Some
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 06:41:40 +0200
Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 07:46:56PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > Intel doesn't have EFER.NX bit.
>
> Of course it does.
>
Right, it does. Some code/comment is misleading... Anyways, reading
intel SDMs, if I understand the
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 07:46:56PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 21:39:04 -0400
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 07:16:39PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > > On AMD, NX feature must be enabled in the efer for NX to be honored
> > > in the pte
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:09:27 -0700
Mukesh Rathor mukesh.rat...@oracle.com wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 06:41:40 +0200
Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 07:46:56PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
Intel doesn't have EFER.NX bit.
Of course it does.
Right, it
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 07:46:56PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 21:39:04 -0400
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 07:16:39PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
On AMD, NX feature must be enabled in the efer for NX to be honored
in
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 06:41:40 +0200
Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 07:46:56PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
Intel doesn't have EFER.NX bit.
Of course it does.
Right, it does. Some code/comment is misleading... Anyways, reading
intel SDMs, if I understand the
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 07:46:56PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> Intel doesn't have EFER.NX bit.
Of course it does.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 21:39:04 -0400
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 07:16:39PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > On AMD, NX feature must be enabled in the efer for NX to be honored
> > in the pte entries, otherwise protection fault. We also set SC for
> > system calls to be
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 07:16:39PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> On AMD, NX feature must be enabled in the efer for NX to be honored in
> the pte entries, otherwise protection fault. We also set SC for
> system calls to be enabled.
How come we don't need to do that for Intel (that is set the NX
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 07:16:39PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
On AMD, NX feature must be enabled in the efer for NX to be honored in
the pte entries, otherwise protection fault. We also set SC for
system calls to be enabled.
How come we don't need to do that for Intel (that is set the NX
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 21:39:04 -0400
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 07:16:39PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
On AMD, NX feature must be enabled in the efer for NX to be honored
in the pte entries, otherwise protection fault. We also set SC for
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 07:46:56PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
Intel doesn't have EFER.NX bit.
Of course it does.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
On AMD, NX feature must be enabled in the efer for NX to be honored in
the pte entries, otherwise protection fault. We also set SC for
system calls to be enabled.
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor
---
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git
On AMD, NX feature must be enabled in the efer for NX to be honored in
the pte entries, otherwise protection fault. We also set SC for
system calls to be enabled.
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor mukesh.rat...@oracle.com
---
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 12
1 file changed, 12
14 matches
Mail list logo
