Re: [WATCHDOG] correct sysfs name for watchdog devices

2005-02-28 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 21:39 +0100, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > drivers/char/watchdog/scx200_wdt.c |2 +- This particular change is also included in my scx200 patch: http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/files/net4801/linux-2.6.11-rc5-scx200.patch >Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [WATCHDOG] correct sysfs name for watchdog devices

2005-02-28 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 21:39 +0100, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: drivers/char/watchdog/scx200_wdt.c |2 +- This particular change is also included in my scx200 patch: http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/files/net4801/linux-2.6.11-rc5-scx200.patch Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[WATCHDOG] correct sysfs name for watchdog devices

2005-02-27 Thread Wim Van Sebroeck
/scx200_wdt.c |2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) through these ChangeSets: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05/02/27 1.2065) [WATCHDOG] correct sysfs name for watchdog devices While looking for possible candidates for our udev.rules package, I found a few odd

[WATCHDOG] correct sysfs name for watchdog devices

2005-02-27 Thread Wim Van Sebroeck
/scx200_wdt.c |2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) through these ChangeSets: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05/02/27 1.2065) [WATCHDOG] correct sysfs name for watchdog devices While looking for possible candidates for our udev.rules package, I found a few odd -name properties