On Thu, Oct 25, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.10.12 at 11:04, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > @@ -1495,38 +1494,53 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void)
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > -void __ref xen_hvm_init_shared_info(void)
>
> Was the __ref here in fact unnecessary (i.e. did you check that
>>> On 25.10.12 at 11:04, Olaf Hering wrote:
> @@ -1495,38 +1494,53 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void)
> #endif
> }
>
> -void __ref xen_hvm_init_shared_info(void)
Was the __ref here in fact unnecessary (i.e. did you check that
its removal doesn't cause any section mismatch
On 25.10.12 at 11:04, Olaf Hering o...@aepfle.de wrote:
@@ -1495,38 +1494,53 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void)
#endif
}
-void __ref xen_hvm_init_shared_info(void)
Was the __ref here in fact unnecessary (i.e. did you check that
its removal doesn't cause any section
On Thu, Oct 25, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.10.12 at 11:04, Olaf Hering o...@aepfle.de wrote:
@@ -1495,38 +1494,53 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void)
#endif
}
-void __ref xen_hvm_init_shared_info(void)
Was the __ref here in fact unnecessary (i.e. did you check that
4 matches
Mail list logo