Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/24] xen/arm: sync_bitops

2012-08-01 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > sync_bitops functions are

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/24] xen/arm: sync_bitops

2012-08-01 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the > > > original

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/24] xen/arm: sync_bitops

2012-08-01 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the original functions,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/24] xen/arm: sync_bitops

2012-08-01 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/24] xen/arm: sync_bitops

2012-07-27 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the > > original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined. > > So why can't the

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/24] xen/arm: sync_bitops

2012-07-27 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined. So why can't the code

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/24] xen/arm: sync_bitops

2012-07-26 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the > original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined. So why can't the code be changed to use that? Is it that the _set_bit, _clear_bit, etc are

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/24] xen/arm: sync_bitops

2012-07-26 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined. So why can't the code be changed to use that? Is it that the _set_bit, _clear_bit, etc are