On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > sync_bitops functions are
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the
> > > original
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the
original functions,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the
> > original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined.
>
> So why can't the
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the
original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined.
So why can't the code
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the
> original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined.
So why can't the code be changed to use that? Is it that
the _set_bit, _clear_bit, etc are
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the
original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined.
So why can't the code be changed to use that? Is it that
the _set_bit, _clear_bit, etc are
8 matches
Mail list logo