On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.09.16 at 12:05, wrote:
On
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.09.16 at 12:05, wrote:
On 14/09/16 22:01, Kyle Huey wrote:
> Xen advertises the underlying support for
On 09/15/2016 03:11 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.09.16 at 12:05, wrote:
>>> On 14/09/16 22:01, Kyle Huey wrote:
Xen advertises the underlying support for CPUID faulting but not does pass
On 09/15/2016 03:11 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.09.16 at 12:05, wrote:
>>> On 14/09/16 22:01, Kyle Huey wrote:
Xen advertises the underlying support for CPUID faulting but not does pass
through writes to the relevant MSR, nor
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.09.16 at 12:05, wrote:
>>> On 14/09/16 22:01, Kyle Huey wrote:
Xen advertises the underlying support for CPUID
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.09.16 at 12:05, wrote:
>>> On 14/09/16 22:01, Kyle Huey wrote:
Xen advertises the underlying support for CPUID faulting but not does pass
through writes to the relevant
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.09.16 at 12:05, wrote:
>> On 14/09/16 22:01, Kyle Huey wrote:
>>> Xen advertises the underlying support for CPUID faulting but not does pass
>>> through writes to the relevant MSR, nor does
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.09.16 at 12:05, wrote:
>> On 14/09/16 22:01, Kyle Huey wrote:
>>> Xen advertises the underlying support for CPUID faulting but not does pass
>>> through writes to the relevant MSR, nor does it virtualize it, so it does
>>> not
>>> On 15.09.16 at 12:05, wrote:
> On 14/09/16 22:01, Kyle Huey wrote:
>> Xen advertises the underlying support for CPUID faulting but not does pass
>> through writes to the relevant MSR, nor does it virtualize it, so it does
>> not actually work. For now mask off the
>>> On 15.09.16 at 12:05, wrote:
> On 14/09/16 22:01, Kyle Huey wrote:
>> Xen advertises the underlying support for CPUID faulting but not does pass
>> through writes to the relevant MSR, nor does it virtualize it, so it does
>> not actually work. For now mask off the relevant bit on
On 14/09/16 22:01, Kyle Huey wrote:
> Xen advertises the underlying support for CPUID faulting but not does pass
> through writes to the relevant MSR, nor does it virtualize it, so it does
> not actually work. For now mask off the relevant bit on MSR_PLATFORM_INFO.
Could you clarify in the commit
On 14/09/16 22:01, Kyle Huey wrote:
> Xen advertises the underlying support for CPUID faulting but not does pass
> through writes to the relevant MSR, nor does it virtualize it, so it does
> not actually work. For now mask off the relevant bit on MSR_PLATFORM_INFO.
Could you clarify in the commit
12 matches
Mail list logo