Hi David,
On 19/05/15 16:39, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 14/05/15 18:01, Julien Grall wrote:
>> The hypercall interface (as well as the toolstack) is always using 4KB
>> page granularity. When the toolstack is asking for mapping a series of
>> guest PFN in a batch, it expects to have the page map
Hi David,
On 19/05/15 16:39, David Vrabel wrote:
On 14/05/15 18:01, Julien Grall wrote:
The hypercall interface (as well as the toolstack) is always using 4KB
page granularity. When the toolstack is asking for mapping a series of
guest PFN in a batch, it expects to have the page map
On 14/05/15 18:01, Julien Grall wrote:
> The hypercall interface (as well as the toolstack) is always using 4KB
> page granularity. When the toolstack is asking for mapping a series of
> guest PFN in a batch, it expects to have the page map contiguously in
> its virtual memory.
>
> When Linux is
On 14/05/15 18:01, Julien Grall wrote:
The hypercall interface (as well as the toolstack) is always using 4KB
page granularity. When the toolstack is asking for mapping a series of
guest PFN in a batch, it expects to have the page map contiguously in
its virtual memory.
When Linux is using
4 matches
Mail list logo