Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 18:51:32 schrieb Stephan Mueller:
Hi,
> > So.. again, I'd avoid using the "fast" accessor unless there is a
> > clear need or obvious benefit. Which should be documented.
>
> So, you suggest ktime_get_raw_ns? If yes, let me test that for one use case.
I tested
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 18:51:32 schrieb Stephan Mueller:
Hi,
> > So.. again, I'd avoid using the "fast" accessor unless there is a
> > clear need or obvious benefit. Which should be documented.
>
> So, you suggest ktime_get_raw_ns? If yes, let me test that for one use case.
I tested
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 10:12:24 schrieb John Stultz:
Hi John,
>
> So this is definitely more clear then what was described earlier, and
> worries me because on many x86 machines (though fewer I guess these
> days then in the past) the clocksource will often not be the TSC (and
> have lower
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 10:12:24 schrieb John Stultz:
Hi John,
>
> So this is definitely more clear then what was described earlier, and
> worries me because on many x86 machines (though fewer I guess these
> days then in the past) the clocksource will often not be the TSC (and
> have lower
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:47:23 schrieb John Stultz:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Stephan Mueller
> wrote:
>> > Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:22:31 schrieb John Stultz:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:47:23 schrieb John Stultz:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Stephan Mueller
> wrote:
>> > Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:22:31 schrieb John Stultz:
>> >
>> > Hi John,
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Jun
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:47:23 schrieb John Stultz:
Hi John,
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Stephan Mueller
wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:22:31 schrieb John Stultz:
> >
> > Hi John,
> >
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:47:23 schrieb John Stultz:
Hi John,
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Stephan Mueller
wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:22:31 schrieb John Stultz:
> >
> > Hi John,
> >
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday, June
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:22:31 schrieb John Stultz:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 8:20:10 AM CEST Stephan Mueller wrote:
>>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:22:31 schrieb John Stultz:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 8:20:10 AM CEST Stephan Mueller wrote:
>> >> Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2016,
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:22:31 schrieb John Stultz:
Hi John,
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 8:20:10 AM CEST Stephan Mueller wrote:
> >> Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2016, 17:59:41 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > Compared to the
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:22:31 schrieb John Stultz:
Hi John,
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 8:20:10 AM CEST Stephan Mueller wrote:
> >> Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2016, 17:59:41 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > Compared to the previous
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 8:20:10 AM CEST Stephan Mueller wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2016, 17:59:41 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
>>
> Compared to the previous __getnstimeofday(), the difference is
>
> - using "monotonic"
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 8:20:10 AM CEST Stephan Mueller wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2016, 17:59:41 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
>>
> Compared to the previous __getnstimeofday(), the difference is
>
> - using "monotonic" timebase instead of
14 matches
Mail list logo