On Wednesday 06 January 2016 20:56:28 Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> >>
> >> That reminds me, we should now remove the code from fs/compat_ioctl.c
> >> that was handling emulating the other ioctl commands, the new .compat_ioctl
> >> callback in ppdev takes care of that along with the
On Wednesday 06 January 2016 20:56:28 Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> >>
> >> That reminds me, we should now remove the code from fs/compat_ioctl.c
> >> that was handling emulating the other ioctl commands, the new .compat_ioctl
> >> callback in ppdev takes care of that along with the
Hi, Sudip
On 01/04/2016 09:14 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 11:40:51PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Saturday 02 January 2016 11:59:29 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
Just to be sure we are talking about the same thing: you mean running a
64-bit
kernel in a
Hi, Sudip
On 01/04/2016 09:14 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 11:40:51PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Saturday 02 January 2016 11:59:29 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
Just to be sure we are talking about the same thing: you mean running a
64-bit
kernel in a
On Monday 04 January 2016 18:44:52 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > If 'uname -i' reports i686, that usually means you have configured the
> > kernel for 32-bit. Try rebuilding the kernel with 'CONFIG_64BIT' and
> > 'CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION' enabled to test that the 32-bit user space now
> > also
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 11:40:51PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 02 January 2016 11:59:29 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > >
> > > Just to be sure we are talking about the same thing: you mean running a
> > > 64-bit
> > > kernel in a kvm guest with a 32-bit file system, right? Running a
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 11:40:51PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 02 January 2016 11:59:29 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > >
> > > Just to be sure we are talking about the same thing: you mean running a
> > > 64-bit
> > > kernel in a kvm guest with a 32-bit file system, right? Running a
On Monday 04 January 2016 18:44:52 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > If 'uname -i' reports i686, that usually means you have configured the
> > kernel for 32-bit. Try rebuilding the kernel with 'CONFIG_64BIT' and
> > 'CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION' enabled to test that the 32-bit user space now
> > also
On Saturday 02 January 2016 11:59:29 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > Just to be sure we are talking about the same thing: you mean running a
> > 64-bit
> > kernel in a kvm guest with a 32-bit file system, right? Running a 32-bit
> > kvm guest on a 64-bit host would not be interesting of course.
>
On Saturday 02 January 2016 11:59:29 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > Just to be sure we are talking about the same thing: you mean running a
> > 64-bit
> > kernel in a kvm guest with a 32-bit file system, right? Running a 32-bit
> > kvm guest on a 64-bit host would not be interesting of course.
>
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 11:09:45PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 01 January 2016 10:34:25 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > Did you happen to check with both 32-bit and 64-bit user space on a
> > > 64-bit kernel? This is one of the things that was not working originally
> > > but should work
On Friday 01 January 2016 10:34:25 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > Did you happen to check with both 32-bit and 64-bit user space on a
> > 64-bit kernel? This is one of the things that was not working originally
> > but should work now.
>
> I dont think I can manage 32 bit userspace on 64-bit kernel
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 11:09:45PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 01 January 2016 10:34:25 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > Did you happen to check with both 32-bit and 64-bit user space on a
> > > 64-bit kernel? This is one of the things that was not working originally
> > > but should work
On Friday 01 January 2016 10:34:25 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > Did you happen to check with both 32-bit and 64-bit user space on a
> > 64-bit kernel? This is one of the things that was not working originally
> > but should work now.
>
> I dont think I can manage 32 bit userspace on 64-bit kernel
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 03:12:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 31 December 2015 15:13:08 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:20:58PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> > > On 12/30/2015 09:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 30 December 2015 21:24:21
On Thursday 31 December 2015 15:13:08 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:20:58PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> > On 12/30/2015 09:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 30 December 2015 21:24:21 Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/char/ppdev.c
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:20:58PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> Hi, Arnd
>
> On 12/30/2015 09:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 December 2015 21:24:21 Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/char/ppdev.c b/drivers/char/ppdev.c
> >> index 31bc7b7..9e98d01 100644
> >>
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:20:58PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> Hi, Arnd
>
> On 12/30/2015 09:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 December 2015 21:24:21 Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/char/ppdev.c b/drivers/char/ppdev.c
> >> index 31bc7b7..9e98d01 100644
> >>
On Thursday 31 December 2015 15:13:08 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:20:58PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> > On 12/30/2015 09:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 30 December 2015 21:24:21 Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/char/ppdev.c
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 03:12:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 31 December 2015 15:13:08 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:20:58PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> > > On 12/30/2015 09:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 30 December 2015 21:24:21
Hi, Arnd
On 12/30/2015 09:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 December 2015 21:24:21 Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/ppdev.c b/drivers/char/ppdev.c
>> index 31bc7b7..9e98d01 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/ppdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/ppdev.c
>> @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@
On Wednesday 30 December 2015 21:24:21 Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ppdev.c b/drivers/char/ppdev.c
> index 31bc7b7..9e98d01 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ppdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ppdev.c
> @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ static int pp_do_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
> cmd,
On Wednesday 30 December 2015 21:24:21 Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ppdev.c b/drivers/char/ppdev.c
> index 31bc7b7..9e98d01 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ppdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ppdev.c
> @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ static int pp_do_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
> cmd,
Hi, Arnd
On 12/30/2015 09:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 December 2015 21:24:21 Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/ppdev.c b/drivers/char/ppdev.c
>> index 31bc7b7..9e98d01 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/ppdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/ppdev.c
>> @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@
24 matches
Mail list logo
