On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Sergio Luis wrote:
if you select Y here it will prompt you about the lguest
hypervisor, the code in question, the one you want to build, and you
will then be able to select it as a module, if you want, or built-in
into the kernel.
Ah, thanks for the clarification. And yes
Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Sergio Luis wrote:
>> oops. sorry, I just realized I missed the makefile part. I changed
>> the config symbol to CONFIG_LGUEST_HYPERVISOR so I should change it on
>> the makefile as well. reposting an updated patch for testing:
>
> Hm, now I cannot sel
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Sergio Luis wrote:
oops. sorry, I just realized I missed the makefile part. I changed
the config symbol to CONFIG_LGUEST_HYPERVISOR so I should change it on
the makefile as well. reposting an updated patch for testing:
Hm, now I cannot select LGUEST as a module any more:
Sergio Luis wrote:
> Christian Kujau wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Sergio Luis wrote:
>>> It doesn't fix the problem totally. If we select
>>> Virtualization->Linux hypervisor example code (CONFIG_LGUEST)
>>> as a module, we will get the same build errors,
>> Confirmed, the build errors persist wi
Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Sergio Luis wrote:
>> It doesn't fix the problem totally. If we select
>> Virtualization->Linux hypervisor example code (CONFIG_LGUEST)
>> as a module, we will get the same build errors,
>
> Confirmed, the build errors persist with CONFIG_LGUEST=m and
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Sergio Luis wrote:
It doesn't fix the problem totally. If we select
Virtualization->Linux hypervisor example code (CONFIG_LGUEST)
as a module, we will get the same build errors,
Confirmed, the build errors persist with CONFIG_LGUEST=m and Rusty's patch
applied.
thanks,
C
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 02 February 2008 04:05:51 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> looks similar to the previous one so i guess my quick fix attempt was a
>>> bit too quick. Will turn lguest off again. And i'm willing to test
>>> patches as well :)
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Saturday 02 February 2008 04:05:51 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > looks similar to the previous one so i guess my quick fix attempt was a
> > bit too quick. Will turn lguest off again. And i'm willing to test
> > patches as well :)
>
> Hi Ingo,
>
>OK, th
On Saturday 02 February 2008 04:05:51 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> looks similar to the previous one so i guess my quick fix attempt was a
> bit too quick. Will turn lguest off again. And i'm willing to test
> patches as well :)
Hi Ingo,
OK, this problem was caused by asm-offsets.c only having the off
On Saturday 02 February 2008 04:05:51 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> looks similar to the previous one so i guess my quick fix attempt was a
> bit too quick. Will turn lguest off again. And i'm willing to test
> patches as well :)
Yes, sorry, I've been completely busy at linux.conf.au.
Will test and fix.
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have just added lguest to the x86 automated testing infrastructure
> back again, and promptly a build failure popped up:
>
> drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S:(.text+0x3815f8): undefined reference
> to `LGUEST_PAGES_regs_trapnum'
>
> (config att
i have just added lguest to the x86 automated testing infrastructure
back again, and promptly a build failure popped up:
drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S:(.text+0x3815f8): undefined reference
to `LGUEST_PAGES_regs_trapnum'
(config attached)
i sent the patch below two weeks ago to fix a si
12 matches
Mail list logo
