Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] rcfs core patch

2007-03-13 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 07:41:37PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:55:05PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > yes, tons of locking, complicated indirections and > > a lot of (partially hard to understand) code ... > > Are you referring to these issues in the general

Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] rcfs core patch

2007-03-13 Thread Srivatsa Vaddagiri
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:55:05PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > yes, tons of locking, complicated indirections and > a lot of (partially hard to understand) code ... Are you referring to these issues in the general Paul Menage's container code or in the RSS-control code posted by Pavel? --

Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] rcfs core patch

2007-03-13 Thread Srivatsa Vaddagiri
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:55:05PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: yes, tons of locking, complicated indirections and a lot of (partially hard to understand) code ... Are you referring to these issues in the general Paul Menage's container code or in the RSS-control code posted by Pavel? --

Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] rcfs core patch

2007-03-13 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 07:41:37PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:55:05PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: yes, tons of locking, complicated indirections and a lot of (partially hard to understand) code ... Are you referring to these issues in the general Paul

Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] rcfs core patch

2007-03-03 Thread Srivatsa Vaddagiri
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:36:49AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > With this don't we end up with a lot of duplicate between cpusets and rcfs. Unless we remove the duplication in cpusets and make it work with rcfs/containers! I wonder if we can avoid so much of filesystem code and use something

Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] rcfs core patch

2007-03-03 Thread Srivatsa Vaddagiri
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:36:49AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: With this don't we end up with a lot of duplicate between cpusets and rcfs. Unless we remove the duplication in cpusets and make it work with rcfs/containers! I wonder if we can avoid so much of filesystem code and use something like

Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] rcfs core patch

2007-03-01 Thread Balbir Singh
Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: Heavily based on Paul Menage's (inturn cpuset) work. The big difference is that the patch uses task->nsproxy to group tasks for resource control purpose (instead of task->containers). The patch retains the same user interface as Paul Menage's patches. In particular,

Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] rcfs core patch

2007-03-01 Thread Balbir Singh
Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: Heavily based on Paul Menage's (inturn cpuset) work. The big difference is that the patch uses task-nsproxy to group tasks for resource control purpose (instead of task-containers). The patch retains the same user interface as Paul Menage's patches. In particular, you