Re: [dm-devel] [RFC] dm-writeboost: plan to go to staging

2013-08-31 Thread Akira Hayakawa
Thanks, Alasdair. I will reply to some of your comments that is not answered up to now. > The documentation file will eventually need rewriting to follow the same > format as the other targets recently added to the kernel. We document > the kernel interface rather than any particular userspace

Re: [dm-devel] [RFC] dm-writeboost: plan to go to staging

2013-08-31 Thread Akira Hayakawa
Hi. Progress report for staging dm-writeboost. (1) Renaming to dm-writeboost Thanks for comments on renaming. By a simple democratic, dm-lc will be renamed to dm-writeboost. I am really happy with the new name. (2) Idea for smelling limitation on the kind of backing store Now I am tackling on

Re: [dm-devel] [RFC] dm-writeboost: plan to go to staging

2013-08-31 Thread Akira Hayakawa
Hi. Progress report for staging dm-writeboost. (1) Renaming to dm-writeboost Thanks for comments on renaming. By a simple democratic, dm-lc will be renamed to dm-writeboost. I am really happy with the new name. (2) Idea for smelling limitation on the kind of backing store Now I am tackling on

Re: [dm-devel] [RFC] dm-writeboost: plan to go to staging

2013-08-31 Thread Akira Hayakawa
Thanks, Alasdair. I will reply to some of your comments that is not answered up to now. The documentation file will eventually need rewriting to follow the same format as the other targets recently added to the kernel. We document the kernel interface rather than any particular userspace