On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 02:00:41PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2016/9/21 8:45, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > @@ -259,40 +290,26 @@ static inline void fill_node_footer_blkaddr(struct
> > page *page, block_t blkaddr)
> > {
> > struct f2fs_checkpoint *ckpt = F2FS_CKPT(F2FS_P_SB(page));
> > struct
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 02:00:41PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2016/9/21 8:45, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > @@ -259,40 +290,26 @@ static inline void fill_node_footer_blkaddr(struct
> > page *page, block_t blkaddr)
> > {
> > struct f2fs_checkpoint *ckpt = F2FS_CKPT(F2FS_P_SB(page));
> > struct
On 2016/9/21 8:45, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> @@ -259,40 +290,26 @@ static inline void fill_node_footer_blkaddr(struct page
> *page, block_t blkaddr)
> {
> struct f2fs_checkpoint *ckpt = F2FS_CKPT(F2FS_P_SB(page));
> struct f2fs_node *rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> + size_t crc_offset =
On 2016/9/21 8:45, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> @@ -259,40 +290,26 @@ static inline void fill_node_footer_blkaddr(struct page
> *page, block_t blkaddr)
> {
> struct f2fs_checkpoint *ckpt = F2FS_CKPT(F2FS_P_SB(page));
> struct f2fs_node *rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> + size_t crc_offset =
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:48:24PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2016/9/20 10:55, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Previously, we used cp_version only to detect recoverable dnodes.
> > In order to avoid same garbage cp_version, we needed to truncate the next
> > dnode during checkpoint,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:48:24PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2016/9/20 10:55, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Previously, we used cp_version only to detect recoverable dnodes.
> > In order to avoid same garbage cp_version, we needed to truncate the next
> > dnode during checkpoint,
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2016/9/20 10:55, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Previously, we used cp_version only to detect recoverable dnodes.
> In order to avoid same garbage cp_version, we needed to truncate the next
> dnode during checkpoint, resulting in additional discard or data write.
> If we can distinguish this
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2016/9/20 10:55, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Previously, we used cp_version only to detect recoverable dnodes.
> In order to avoid same garbage cp_version, we needed to truncate the next
> dnode during checkpoint, resulting in additional discard or data write.
> If we can distinguish this
8 matches
Mail list logo