On 2021/2/2 17:07, Daeho Jeong wrote:
If I understand it correctly, the only thing I have to do now is
remove "nocheckpoint_merge" now.
Am I correct? :)
For this patch, Yup. :)
Thanks,
2021년 2월 2일 (화) 오후 5:30, Chao Yu 님이 작성:
On 2021/2/2 16:02, Daeho Jeong wrote:
I chose the same step wit
If I understand it correctly, the only thing I have to do now is
remove "nocheckpoint_merge" now.
Am I correct? :)
2021년 2월 2일 (화) 오후 5:30, Chao Yu 님이 작성:
>
> On 2021/2/2 16:02, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> > I chose the same step with "flush_merge", because it doesn't have
> > "noflush_merge".
>
> Oh, "n
On 2021/2/2 16:02, Daeho Jeong wrote:
I chose the same step with "flush_merge", because it doesn't have
"noflush_merge".
Oh, "noxxx" option was added only when we set the option by default in
default_options(), when user want to disable the default option, it
needs to use "noxxx" option, and th
I chose the same step with "flush_merge", because it doesn't have
"noflush_merge".
Do you think we need that for both, "noflush_merge" and "nocheckpoint_merge"?
I thought we needed to give some time to make this be turned on by
default. It might be a little radical. :)
What do you think?
2021년 2
On 2021/2/2 13:18, Daeho Jeong wrote:
From: Daeho Jeong
As checkpoint=merge comes in, mount option setting related to checkpoint
had been mixed up and it became hard to understand. So, I separated
this option from "checkpoint=" and made another mount option
"checkpoint_merge" for this.
Signed-
On 02/02, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> From: Daeho Jeong
>
> As checkpoint=merge comes in, mount option setting related to checkpoint
> had been mixed up and it became hard to understand. So, I separated
> this option from "checkpoint=" and made another mount option
> "checkpoint_merge" for this.
Thanks
6 matches
Mail list logo
