On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 02:09 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Anyway, if ppc folks can live with that stuff in its current form for now,
> here's the second signal.git pull request. Stuff in there: kernel_thread/
> kernel_execve/sys_execve conversions for several more architectures plus
> assorted signal
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 02:09 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
Anyway, if ppc folks can live with that stuff in its current form for now,
here's the second signal.git pull request. Stuff in there: kernel_thread/
kernel_execve/sys_execve conversions for several more architectures plus
assorted signal fixes
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 02:09:58AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>
> How granular are you planning to make that? I mean, we are talking about
> 3 objects here - init/main.o, kernel/kthread.o and kernel/kmod.o. Do they
> get TOC separate from that of arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.o?
Potentially, yes, it
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:16:33AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 01:53:06PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>
> > Umm... Maybe, but let's do that as subsequent cleanup. Again,
> > we almost certainly don't need to mess with TOC at all - the callbacks
> > are in the main
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:16:33AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 01:53:06PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
Umm... Maybe, but let's do that as subsequent cleanup. Again,
we almost certainly don't need to mess with TOC at all - the callbacks
are in the main kernel, there
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 02:09:58AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
How granular are you planning to make that? I mean, we are talking about
3 objects here - init/main.o, kernel/kthread.o and kernel/kmod.o. Do they
get TOC separate from that of arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.o?
Potentially, yes, it
6 matches
Mail list logo
