Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-28 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:26 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > > > > Hi Ingo... back to testing. > > > History: > > > > > > 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable

Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-28 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > > Hi Ingo... back to testing. > > History: > > > > 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio applications. > > 2.6.24-rt1: same so far. > > > > Why: Jack keep

Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-26 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > Hi Ingo... back to testing. > History: > > 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio applications. > 2.6.24-rt1: same so far. > > Why: Jack keeps printing "delayed..." messages and has xruns which means > that somehow

Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-26 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nope, it doesn't still getting "delay" and "xrun" messa

Re: [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes

2007-12-09 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Guillaume Chazarain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 9, 2007 7:01 PM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > + * ns += offset to avoid sched_clock jumps with cpufreq > > > + * > > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] "math is hard, lets go shopping!" > > > */ > > > > Did john

Re: [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes

2007-12-09 Thread Guillaume Chazarain
On Dec 9, 2007 7:01 PM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > + * ns += offset to avoid sched_clock jumps with cpufreq > > + * > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] "math is hard, lets go shopping!" > > */ > > Did john add the 'ns+=' or do comments need reorder? I added it, but I th

Re: [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes

2007-12-09 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > @@ -78,15 +79,35 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(check_tsc_unstable); > * cyc2ns_scale is limited to 10^6 * 2^10, which fits in 32 bits. > * ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > * > + * ns += offset to avoid sched_clock jumps with cpufreq > + * > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] "math is hard, lets g

Re: [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes

2007-12-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Nope, it doesn't still getting "delay" and "xrun" messages galore. > > > > > > Attached: configuration and dmesg output

Re: [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes

2007-12-07 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Nope, it doesn't still getting "delay" and "xrun" messages galore. > > > > Attached: configuration and dmesg output booting with idle=poll, > > reconfirmed that that makes the dela

Re: [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes

2007-12-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nope, it doesn't still getting "delay" and "xrun" messages galore. > > Attached: configuration and dmesg output booting with idle=poll, > reconfirmed that that makes the delay and xrun messages go away. could you try the rolled up patch o

Re: [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes

2007-12-07 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ingo, I was about to post about timer problems in 2.6.23.9+rt12 when I > > saw this. Would this be related / should I test / will this solve > > everything? :-) > > > > What I'm see

Re: [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes

2007-12-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ingo, I was about to post about timer problems in 2.6.23.9+rt12 when I > saw this. Would this be related / should I test / will this solve > everything? :-) > > What I'm seeing is jack "delays" that go away if I boot with > "idle=poll", ju

Re: [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes

2007-12-07 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Linus, please pull the latest x86 git tree from: > >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git > > This contains 3 x86/hrtimer/hpet/ACPI fixes from Thomas: the ACPI fix > has been ACK-ed by Venki. Build and boot

[git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes

2007-12-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
Linus, please pull the latest x86 git tree from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git This contains 3 x86/hrtimer/hpet/ACPI fixes from Thomas: the ACPI fix has been ACK-ed by Venki. Build and boot tested on various boxes. Ingo --> Thom