Re: [LKP] [ide] ec7d9c9ce8: WARNING:at_fs/proc/generic.c:#remove_proc_entry

2018-12-20 Thread Philip Li
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 08:05:28AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 1:19 AM kernel test robot wrote: > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7): > > > > commit: ec7d9c9ce897174243af4fcd201dbfc34df0f3a3 ("ide: replace ->proc_fops > > with ->proc_show") >

Re: [ide] ec7d9c9ce8: WARNING:at_fs/proc/generic.c:#remove_proc_entry

2018-12-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 09:14:50AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > Maybe the the tiny subset of IDE users don't actually have the proc > stuff enabled? A few months ago I did plenty of IDE testing with the > MQ conversion, but I never saw anything like this. I'm guessing that > I, too, did not have

Re: [ide] ec7d9c9ce8: WARNING:at_fs/proc/generic.c:#remove_proc_entry

2018-12-20 Thread Jens Axboe
On 12/20/18 9:05 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 1:19 AM kernel test robot wrote: >> >> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7): >> >> commit: ec7d9c9ce897174243af4fcd201dbfc34df0f3a3 ("ide: replace ->proc_fops >> with ->proc_show") >>

Re: [ide] ec7d9c9ce8: WARNING:at_fs/proc/generic.c:#remove_proc_entry

2018-12-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 1:19 AM kernel test robot wrote: > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7): > > commit: ec7d9c9ce897174243af4fcd201dbfc34df0f3a3 ("ide: replace ->proc_fops > with ->proc_show") > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master

[ide] ec7d9c9ce8: WARNING:at_fs/proc/generic.c:#remove_proc_entry

2018-12-20 Thread kernel test robot
FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7): commit: ec7d9c9ce897174243af4fcd201dbfc34df0f3a3 ("ide: replace ->proc_fops with ->proc_show") https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master in testcase: rcutorture with following parameters: runtime: