Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCHv2 5/7] printk: allow kmsg to be encrypted using public key encryption

2018-01-17 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 18:44:45 -0500 Daniel Micay wrote: > > Do you have any backing from makers of such devices? I'd like to hear > > from Google's Android team or whoever that would turn this feature on. > > (I'm not a Google employee, but I work on Android security and

Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCHv2 5/7] printk: allow kmsg to be encrypted using public key encryption

2018-01-17 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 18:44:45 -0500 Daniel Micay wrote: > > Do you have any backing from makers of such devices? I'd like to hear > > from Google's Android team or whoever that would turn this feature on. > > (I'm not a Google employee, but I work on Android security and > contribute some of

Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCHv2 5/7] printk: allow kmsg to be encrypted using public key encryption

2018-01-16 Thread Daniel Micay
> Do you have any backing from makers of such devices? I'd like to hear > from Google's Android team or whoever that would turn this feature on. (I'm not a Google employee, but I work on Android security and contribute some of that to AOSP.) Android restricts access to dmesg with SELinux, so

Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCHv2 5/7] printk: allow kmsg to be encrypted using public key encryption

2018-01-16 Thread Daniel Micay
> Do you have any backing from makers of such devices? I'd like to hear > from Google's Android team or whoever that would turn this feature on. (I'm not a Google employee, but I work on Android security and contribute some of that to AOSP.) Android restricts access to dmesg with SELinux, so