Heiko Carstens wrote:
The only thing remotely relevant in the list config is that 'Filter out
duplicate messages to list members (if possible)' is set as a default for
new members. Maybe this means that if a cc is also part of the list, that
cc is stripped (which seems a wierd implementati
> The only thing remotely relevant in the list config is that 'Filter out
> duplicate messages to list members (if possible)' is set as a default for
> new members. Maybe this means that if a cc is also part of the list, that
> cc is stripped (which seems a wierd implementation; I'd have ex
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
As guest accounting is hw dependent, I think we should add a hook in the
accounting functions.
>>> Isn't PF_VM exactly such a hook? All the hypervisor needs to do is to
>>> set/unset it correctly?
>
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
> >> As guest accounting is hw dependent, I think we should add a hook in the
> >> accounting functions.
> >>
> >
> > Isn't PF_VM exactly such a hook? All the hypervisor needs to do is to
> > set/unset it correctly?
>
> In fact, no.
>
> PF_V
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Avi Kivity:
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
[copying Ingo and Rusty]
@Avi, seems that sourceforge is mangling the cc list?
It's not c
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>> Am Freitag, 10. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
>>>
The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a
virtual
machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way
Laurent Vivier wrote:
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Freitag, 10. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to do
that.
I did something simi
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Avi Kivity:
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
> >
> >>> [copying Ingo and Rusty]
> >>>
> >
> > @Avi, seems that sourceforge is mangling the cc list?
> >
> >
>
> It's not configured to do so. Can yo
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Avi Kivity:
> Laurent's patch gives the best of both worlds: on old 'top', you get
> guest time accounted as user time, while on new 'top' it is accounted
> separately. This is done by reporting user time as the sum of the real
> user time and guest time. A
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Freitag, 10. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
>> The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
>> machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to do
> that.
>
> I did something similar for or s390guest prototy
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
[copying Ingo and Rusty]
@Avi, seems that sourceforge is mangling the cc list?
It's not configured to do so. Can you be more specific?
The patches look good. A couple of comments:
- perhaps th
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
> > [copying Ingo and Rusty]
@Avi, seems that sourceforge is mangling the cc list?
> >
> > The patches look good. A couple of comments:
> >
> > - perhaps the new fields should be guarded by a #ifdef CONFIG_HYPERVISOR
> > (selected by CONFIG_KV
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Freitag, 10. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to do
that.
I did something similar for or s390guest prototype
Am Freitag, 10. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
> The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
> machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to do
that.
I did something similar for or s390guest prototype, that Carsten posted in
May. I dec
Laurent Vivier wrote:
Are these options for using the kernel as a guest or host? I'd guess
the former.
I didn't find CONFIG_HYPERVISOR.
I meant, add a new option CONFIG_HYPERVISOR.
The good one seems to be CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION that is used to activate
CONFIG_KVM.
It's ju
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>> - perhaps the new fields should be guarded by a #ifdef CONFIG_HYPERVISOR
>>> (selected by CONFIG_KVM)? that way the (minor) additional overhead is
>>> only incurred if it can possibly be used. I imagine that our canine
>>> cousin will want to use this
Laurent Vivier wrote:
- perhaps the new fields should be guarded by a #ifdef CONFIG_HYPERVISOR
(selected by CONFIG_KVM)? that way the (minor) additional overhead is
only incurred if it can possibly be used. I imagine that our canine
cousin will want to use this as well.
There is also a C
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
>> machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to
>> do that.
>>
>> [PATCH 1/2] introduce a new field, "guest", in cpustat to store the
>> time used by
>> t
Laurent Vivier wrote:
The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to do that.
[PATCH 1/2] introduce a new field, "guest", in cpustat to store the time used by
the CPU to run virtual CPU. Modify /pro
19 matches
Mail list logo
