On 19/01/21 08:41, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
Hi Paolo,
Thank you for your time. I was just thinking about resending this patch
series to ping you although no changes will be added. I really hope to
get the comments from you.
Do you want me to resend a new non-RFC version as well as the QEMU
On 1/19/2021 2:27 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 18/01/21 18:45, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 05/11/2020 09.18, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
This unit-test is intended to test the KVM support for Protection Keys
for Supervisor Pages (PKS). If CR4.PKS is set in long mode, supervisor
pkeys are checked in
On 18/01/21 18:45, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 05/11/2020 09.18, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
This unit-test is intended to test the KVM support for Protection Keys
for Supervisor Pages (PKS). If CR4.PKS is set in long mode, supervisor
pkeys are checked in addition to normal paging protections and Access or
On 05/11/2020 09.18, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
This unit-test is intended to test the KVM support for Protection Keys
for Supervisor Pages (PKS). If CR4.PKS is set in long mode, supervisor
pkeys are checked in addition to normal paging protections and Access or
Write can be disabled via a MSR update
This unit-test is intended to test the KVM support for Protection Keys
for Supervisor Pages (PKS). If CR4.PKS is set in long mode, supervisor
pkeys are checked in addition to normal paging protections and Access or
Write can be disabled via a MSR update without TLB flushes when
permissions change.
This unit-test is intended to test the KVM support for Protection Keys
for Supervisor Pages (PKS). If CR4.PKS is set in long mode, supervisor
pkeys are checked in addition to normal paging protections and Access or
Write can be disabled via a MSR update without TLB flushes when
permissions change.
6 matches
Mail list logo
