Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]

2013-02-08 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 8 February 2013 22:21, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> No, it did NOT apply cleanly and I merged your tree like this. Patch looks fine to me. >> To me it does not look like your changes from the patch you sent me >> are included? Yes they do. Check most of the changes from cpufreq.c which remove locks

Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]

2013-02-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: Nah, I pulled in latest pm-next where this commit is new... commit

Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]

2013-02-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> Nah, I pulled in latest pm-next where this commit is new... >>> >>> commit 8d5666f3456f2fd4a4e5dced228475b829851e53 >>> "ACPI: Unbind

Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]

2013-02-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Nah, I pulled in latest pm-next where this commit is new... >> >> commit 8d5666f3456f2fd4a4e5dced228475b829851e53 >> "ACPI: Unbind ACPI drv when probe failed" >> >> ...building with it. >>

Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]

2013-02-08 Thread Viresh Kumar
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Nah, I pulled in latest pm-next where this commit is new... > > commit 8d5666f3456f2fd4a4e5dced228475b829851e53 > "ACPI: Unbind ACPI drv when probe failed" > > ...building with it. > > Same to you, say concretely which commit is fixing what... >

Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]

2013-02-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 8 February 2013 18:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Friday, February 08, 2013 01:47:44 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> >> [0.377473] [] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 >>> >> [0.377479] [] ? acpi_cpufreq_target+0x2c0/0x2c0 >>> >> [

Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]

2013-02-08 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 8 February 2013 18:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, February 08, 2013 01:47:44 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> [0.377473] [] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 >> >> [0.377479] [] ? acpi_cpufreq_target+0x2c0/0x2c0 >> >> [0.377483] [] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 >> >> [0.377