On 11/29/07, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
>
> > The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and
> > that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying
> > that should work and worked under 2.6.21 and is
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
> Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
> >
> >> The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and
> >> that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying
> >> that should work and worked
Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and
that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying
that should work and worked under 2.6.21 and is not working currently
is the ability to
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
> The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and
> that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying
> that should work and worked under 2.6.21 and is not working currently
> is the ability to unplug and plug
The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and
that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying
that should work and worked under 2.6.21 and is not working currently
is the ability to unplug and plug back in the device while the
computer is suspended before
The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and
that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying
that should work and worked under 2.6.21 and is not working currently
is the ability to unplug and plug back in the device while the
computer is suspended before
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and
that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying
that should work and worked under 2.6.21 and is not working currently
is the ability to unplug and plug back
Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and
that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying
that should work and worked under 2.6.21 and is not working currently
is the ability to
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and
that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying
that should work and worked under 2.6.21 and
On 11/29/07, Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and
that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying
that should work and worked under 2.6.21 and is not
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> Here's what I got after compiling kernel with CONFIG_USB_PERSIST and
> CONFIG_USB_DEBUG both enabled. The attached files are:
>
> config - shows the .config file used when compiling kernel 2.6.23.9
>
> sysandmount.txt - shows mounts
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
Hi Alan,
Here's what I got after compiling kernel with CONFIG_USB_PERSIST and
CONFIG_USB_DEBUG both enabled. The attached files are:
config - shows the .config file used when compiling kernel 2.6.23.9
sysandmount.txt - shows mounts and the
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
> > Wait a minute. You're saying that USB Persist worked under 2.6.21
> > because it wasn't available? That makes no sense. Besides, if you
> > don't like USB Persist under 2.6.23, you can always eliminate it by
> > turning off CONFIG_USB_PERSIST.
Thanks for responding Alan.
On 11/26/07, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
>
> > The device which has the root fs is a READ-ONLY device. There is no
> > way for it to change between getting detached and reattached to the
> > computer which is
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
> The device which has the root fs is a READ-ONLY device. There is no
> way for it to change between getting detached and reattached to the
> computer which is suspended.
You might think so at first. But suppose another device of the same
type got
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
The device which has the root fs is a READ-ONLY device. There is no
way for it to change between getting detached and reattached to the
computer which is suspended.
You might think so at first. But suppose another device of the same
type got
Thanks for responding Alan.
On 11/26/07, Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
The device which has the root fs is a READ-ONLY device. There is no
way for it to change between getting detached and reattached to the
computer which is suspended.
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote:
Wait a minute. You're saying that USB Persist worked under 2.6.21
because it wasn't available? That makes no sense. Besides, if you
don't like USB Persist under 2.6.23, you can always eliminate it by
turning off CONFIG_USB_PERSIST.
I
The device which has the root fs is a READ-ONLY device. There is no
way for it to change between getting detached and reattached to the
computer which is suspended. In such a case there is no possibility of
hibernation because there is nothing to write back to.
I understand that this is currently
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:04:32 -0700 "Raymano Garibaldi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Is there any other information that I can provide which might help in
> > resolving this bug?
>
> Let's cc the USB developers.
>
> > On 11/18/07, Raymano
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:04:32 -0700 Raymano Garibaldi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there any other information that I can provide which might help in
resolving this bug?
Let's cc the USB developers.
On 11/18/07, Raymano Garibaldi [EMAIL
The device which has the root fs is a READ-ONLY device. There is no
way for it to change between getting detached and reattached to the
computer which is suspended. In such a case there is no possibility of
hibernation because there is nothing to write back to.
I understand that this is currently
22 matches
Mail list logo
