On 10/26/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 11:11:22AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 10/26/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Anyway the sysfs_dirent_exist is useful for extern use, How about add
> > > > and export this function? Greg, If you agree, I
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 11:11:22AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 10/26/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Anyway the sysfs_dirent_exist is useful for extern use, How about add
> > > and export this function? Greg, If you agree, I would send it as
> > > another patch.
> >
> > What would
On 10/26/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:01:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 10/26/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 05:06:59PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > On 10/19/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >On
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:01:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 10/26/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 05:06:59PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > On 10/19/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:48:52AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> >
On 10/26/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 05:06:59PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 10/19/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:48:52AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > On
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 05:06:59PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 10/19/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:48:52AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> >> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> >> >
On 10/19/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:48:52AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
>> > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I haven't
On 10/19/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:48:52AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
I haven't looked at this code at
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 05:06:59PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/19/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:48:52AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct
On 10/26/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 05:06:59PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/19/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:48:52AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:01:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/26/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 05:06:59PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/19/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:48:52AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 16
On 10/26/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:01:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/26/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 05:06:59PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/19/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 11:11:22AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/26/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway the sysfs_dirent_exist is useful for extern use, How about add
and export this function? Greg, If you agree, I would send it as
another patch.
What would need that
On 10/26/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 11:11:22AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/26/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway the sysfs_dirent_exist is useful for extern use, How about add
and export this function? Greg, If you agree, I would send it as
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:48:52AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> > >
> > > > I haven't looked at this code at all, but neither approach feels
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:48:52AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
I haven't looked at this code at all, but neither approach feels right
to
On 10/17/07, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> > >
> > > > I haven't looked at this code at all, but neither approach feels right
> >
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> >
> > > I haven't looked at this code at all, but neither approach feels right to
> > > me.
> > >
> > > How does this work at all? Even if you
On 10/17/07, Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
I haven't looked at this code at all, but neither approach feels right
to
me.
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
I haven't looked at this code at all, but neither approach feels right to
me.
How does this work at all? Even if you load a driver
>On 10/17/07, Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> >
> > > I haven't looked at this code at all, but neither approach feels right to
> > > me.
> > >
> > > How does this work at all?
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
>
> > I haven't looked at this code at all, but neither approach feels right to
> > me.
> >
> > How does this work at all? Even if you load a driver later, wouldn't it
> > call
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> I haven't looked at this code at all, but neither approach feels right to
> me.
>
> How does this work at all? Even if you load a driver later, wouldn't it
> call usb_set_interface(), which would call usb_create_sysfs_intf_files()
> and hit the same
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:55:54AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Dave Young wrote:
>
> > > I finally duplicated this on one of my machines here at boot time, with
> > > USB built into the kernel. I'll work tomorrow on tracking this down
> > > further...
> > Hi,
> > I add some
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Dave Young wrote:
> > I finally duplicated this on one of my machines here at boot time, with
> > USB built into the kernel. I'll work tomorrow on tracking this down
> > further...
> Hi,
> I add some printk messages, dump_stack and some others, here is the
> dmesg dump with
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Dave Young wrote:
I finally duplicated this on one of my machines here at boot time, with
USB built into the kernel. I'll work tomorrow on tracking this down
further...
Hi,
I add some printk messages, dump_stack and some others, here is the
dmesg dump with debug
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:55:54AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Dave Young wrote:
I finally duplicated this on one of my machines here at boot time, with
USB built into the kernel. I'll work tomorrow on tracking this down
further...
Hi,
I add some printk messages,
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
I haven't looked at this code at all, but neither approach feels right to
me.
How does this work at all? Even if you load a driver later, wouldn't it
call usb_set_interface(), which would call usb_create_sysfs_intf_files()
and hit the same issue?
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
I haven't looked at this code at all, but neither approach feels right to
me.
How does this work at all? Even if you load a driver later, wouldn't it
call usb_set_interface(), which
On 10/17/07, Matthew Dharm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Dharm wrote:
I haven't looked at this code at all, but neither approach feels right to
me.
How does this work at all? Even if you load a
>On 10/16/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 02:38:25PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Dave Young wrote:
> >
> > > On 10/14/07, Borislav Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > i get the following warning on yesterday's git
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 02:38:25PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Dave Young wrote:
>
> > On 10/14/07, Borislav Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > i get the following warning on yesterday's git tree
> > > (v2.6.23-2840-g752097c):
> > >
> > > Oct 14 09:07:15
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Dave Young wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Borislav Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i get the following warning on yesterday's git tree (v2.6.23-2840-g752097c):
> >
> > Oct 14 09:07:15 zmei kernel: [ 49.368030] sysfs: duplicate filename
> > 'bInterfaceNumber' can
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/14/07, Borislav Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i get the following warning on yesterday's git tree (v2.6.23-2840-g752097c):
Oct 14 09:07:15 zmei kernel: [ 49.368030] sysfs: duplicate filename
'bInterfaceNumber' can not be created
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 02:38:25PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/14/07, Borislav Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i get the following warning on yesterday's git tree
(v2.6.23-2840-g752097c):
Oct 14 09:07:15 zmei kernel: [
On 10/16/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 02:38:25PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Dave Young wrote:
On 10/14/07, Borislav Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i get the following warning on yesterday's git tree
36 matches
Mail list logo
