Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps

2015-09-29 Thread Huang, Ying
David Ahern writes: > On 9/23/15 6:37 PM, Huang Ying wrote: >>> >>> I take it you have CONFIG_NET_VRF enabled. correct? >>> >>> With it disabled I see no relevant change in performance between >>> 8f58336d3f78 and 192132b9a034. Can you confirm? >> >> The kconfig file is attached with the mail.

Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps

2015-09-29 Thread Huang, Ying
David Ahern writes: > On 9/23/15 6:37 PM, Huang Ying wrote: >>> >>> I take it you have CONFIG_NET_VRF enabled. correct? >>> >>> With it disabled I see no relevant change in performance between >>> 8f58336d3f78 and 192132b9a034. Can you confirm? >> >> The kconfig file is

Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps

2015-09-23 Thread David Ahern
On 9/23/15 6:37 PM, Huang Ying wrote: I take it you have CONFIG_NET_VRF enabled. correct? With it disabled I see no relevant change in performance between 8f58336d3f78 and 192132b9a034. Can you confirm? The kconfig file is attached with the mail. It appears that CONFIG_NET_VRF is disabled.

Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps

2015-09-23 Thread David Ahern
On 9/20/15 7:33 PM, Huang Ying wrote: Also, this is the end patch of a series that first refactors and then adds a capability. The more relevant comparison is 8f58336d3f78 to 192132b9a034 (8f58336d3f78 is the commit before the series). Is it possible to get this test run on your system comparing

Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps

2015-09-23 Thread David Ahern
On 9/20/15 7:33 PM, Huang Ying wrote: Also, this is the end patch of a series that first refactors and then adds a capability. The more relevant comparison is 8f58336d3f78 to 192132b9a034 (8f58336d3f78 is the commit before the series). Is it possible to get this test run on your system comparing

Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps

2015-09-23 Thread David Ahern
On 9/23/15 6:37 PM, Huang Ying wrote: I take it you have CONFIG_NET_VRF enabled. correct? With it disabled I see no relevant change in performance between 8f58336d3f78 and 192132b9a034. Can you confirm? The kconfig file is attached with the mail. It appears that CONFIG_NET_VRF is disabled.

Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps

2015-09-20 Thread David Ahern
On 9/20/15 7:33 PM, Huang Ying wrote: Clarification: The reproduce file shows 128 instances of 'netperf -t TCP_CRR -c -C -l 300 -H 127.0.0.1' without an '&' on the end. Does that mean these 128 commands are run serially? Sorry. It's a script bug, there should be a "&" on the end. Will fix

Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps

2015-09-20 Thread Huang Ying
On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 19:19 -0600, David Ahern wrote: > On 9/20/15 6:30 AM, kernel test robot wrote: > > FYI, we noticed the below changes on > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > > master > > commit 192132b9a034d87566294be0fba5f8f75c2cf16b ("net: Add

Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps

2015-09-20 Thread David Ahern
On 9/20/15 6:30 AM, kernel test robot wrote: FYI, we noticed the below changes on https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master commit 192132b9a034d87566294be0fba5f8f75c2cf16b ("net: Add support for VRFs to inetpeer cache")

Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps

2015-09-20 Thread Huang Ying
On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 19:19 -0600, David Ahern wrote: > On 9/20/15 6:30 AM, kernel test robot wrote: > > FYI, we noticed the below changes on > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > > master > > commit 192132b9a034d87566294be0fba5f8f75c2cf16b ("net: Add

Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps

2015-09-20 Thread David Ahern
On 9/20/15 6:30 AM, kernel test robot wrote: FYI, we noticed the below changes on https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master commit 192132b9a034d87566294be0fba5f8f75c2cf16b ("net: Add support for VRFs to inetpeer cache")

Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps

2015-09-20 Thread David Ahern
On 9/20/15 7:33 PM, Huang Ying wrote: Clarification: The reproduce file shows 128 instances of 'netperf -t TCP_CRR -c -C -l 300 -H 127.0.0.1' without an '&' on the end. Does that mean these 128 commands are run serially? Sorry. It's a script bug, there should be a "&" on the end. Will fix