On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:35:59AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/09/2012 04:42 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:55:26PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >>Hi Guenter,
> >>
> >>This commit triggered an oops which can be fixed by the attached diff.
> >>Should it be
Hi,
On 08/09/2012 04:42 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:55:26PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Hi Guenter,
This commit triggered an oops which can be fixed by the attached diff.
Should it be folded into the original one (preferable for me), or be
resent as a standalone patch?
Hi,
On 08/09/2012 04:42 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:55:26PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Hi Guenter,
This commit triggered an oops which can be fixed by the attached diff.
Should it be folded into the original one (preferable for me), or be
resent as a standalone patch?
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:35:59AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 08/09/2012 04:42 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:55:26PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Hi Guenter,
This commit triggered an oops which can be fixed by the attached diff.
Should it be folded into the
4 matches
Mail list logo