Re: [lm-sensors] NULL dereference BUG in sch56xx_init()

2012-08-10 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:35:59AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/09/2012 04:42 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:55:26PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > >>Hi Guenter, > >> > >>This commit triggered an oops which can be fixed by the attached diff. > >>Should it be

Re: [lm-sensors] NULL dereference BUG in sch56xx_init()

2012-08-10 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 08/09/2012 04:42 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:55:26PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: Hi Guenter, This commit triggered an oops which can be fixed by the attached diff. Should it be folded into the original one (preferable for me), or be resent as a standalone patch?

Re: [lm-sensors] NULL dereference BUG in sch56xx_init()

2012-08-10 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 08/09/2012 04:42 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:55:26PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: Hi Guenter, This commit triggered an oops which can be fixed by the attached diff. Should it be folded into the original one (preferable for me), or be resent as a standalone patch?

Re: [lm-sensors] NULL dereference BUG in sch56xx_init()

2012-08-10 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:35:59AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 08/09/2012 04:42 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:55:26PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: Hi Guenter, This commit triggered an oops which can be fixed by the attached diff. Should it be folded into the