On 11/13/20 7:29 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:01:26 -0800
> Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
>>> UAPI solution 2
>>>
>>> we turn "table" into an optional parameter and we add the "vrftable"
>>> optional
>>> parameter. DT4 can only be used with the "vrftable" (hence it
Hi Jakub,
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:01:26 -0800
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > UAPI solution 2
> >
> > we turn "table" into an optional parameter and we add the "vrftable"
> > optional
> > parameter. DT4 can only be used with the "vrftable" (hence it is a required
> > parameter for DT4).
> > DT6 can
On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 02:50:58 +0100 Andrea Mayer wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
> Please see my responses inline:
>
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:54:37 -0800
> Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 00:00:24 +0100 Andrea Mayer wrote:
> > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:40:10 -0800
> > > Jakub Kicinski
Hi Jakub,
Please see my responses inline:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:54:37 -0800
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 00:00:24 +0100 Andrea Mayer wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:40:10 -0800
> > Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >
> > I can tackle the v6 version but how do we face the compatibility
On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 00:00:24 +0100 Andrea Mayer wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:40:10 -0800
> Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:40:36 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > agreed. The v6 variant has existed for a while. The v4 version is
> > > > independent.
> > >
> > >
Hi Jakub,
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:40:10 -0800
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:40:36 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > agreed. The v6 variant has existed for a while. The v4 version is
> > > independent.
> >
> > Okay, I'm not sure what's the right call so I asked DaveM.
>
>
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:40:36 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > agreed. The v6 variant has existed for a while. The v4 version is
> > independent.
>
> Okay, I'm not sure what's the right call so I asked DaveM.
DaveM raised a concern that unless we implement v6 now we can't be sure
the interface
Il 2020-11-13 20:40, Jakub Kicinski ha scritto:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:04:44 -0700 David Ahern wrote:
On 11/13/20 10:02 AM, Stefano Salsano wrote:
Il 2020-11-13 17:55, Jakub Kicinski ha scritto:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:49:17 -0700 David Ahern wrote:
On 11/12/20 6:28 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:04:44 -0700 David Ahern wrote:
> On 11/13/20 10:02 AM, Stefano Salsano wrote:
> > Il 2020-11-13 17:55, Jakub Kicinski ha scritto:
> >> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:49:17 -0700 David Ahern wrote:
> >>> On 11/12/20 6:28 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> The implementation of SRv6
Il 2020-11-13 17:55, Jakub Kicinski ha scritto:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:49:17 -0700 David Ahern wrote:
On 11/12/20 6:28 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
The implementation of SRv6 End.DT4 differs from the the implementation of SRv6
End.DT6 due to the different *route input* lookup functions. For IPv6 is
On 11/13/20 10:02 AM, Stefano Salsano wrote:
> Il 2020-11-13 17:55, Jakub Kicinski ha scritto:
>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:49:17 -0700 David Ahern wrote:
>>> On 11/12/20 6:28 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
The implementation of SRv6 End.DT4 differs from the the
implementation of SRv6
End.DT6
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:49:17 -0700 David Ahern wrote:
> On 11/12/20 6:28 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> > The implementation of SRv6 End.DT4 differs from the the implementation of
> > SRv6
> > End.DT6 due to the different *route input* lookup functions. For IPv6 is it
> > possible to force the routing
On 11/12/20 6:28 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> The implementation of SRv6 End.DT4 differs from the the implementation of SRv6
> End.DT6 due to the different *route input* lookup functions. For IPv6 is it
> possible to force the routing lookup specifying a routing table through the
> ip6_pol_route()
Hi Jakub,
many thanks for your review. Please see my responses inline:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 15:12:55 -0800
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 16:31:38 +0100 Andrea Mayer wrote:
> > SRv6 End.DT4 is defined in the SRv6 Network Programming [1].
> >
> > The SRv6 End.DT4 is used to
On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 16:31:38 +0100 Andrea Mayer wrote:
> SRv6 End.DT4 is defined in the SRv6 Network Programming [1].
>
> The SRv6 End.DT4 is used to implement IPv4 L3VPN use-cases in
> multi-tenants environments. It decapsulates the received packets and it
> performs IPv4 routing lookup in the
SRv6 End.DT4 is defined in the SRv6 Network Programming [1].
The SRv6 End.DT4 is used to implement IPv4 L3VPN use-cases in
multi-tenants environments. It decapsulates the received packets and it
performs IPv4 routing lookup in the routing table of the tenant.
The SRv6 End.DT4 Linux
16 matches
Mail list logo
