> I already put other changes into net-next and also just merged 'net'
> into 'net-next' and pushed that out to git.kernel.org, so I don't know
> how I can still do that for you.
Okay, it is just one patch. I will apply it to my tree as well. Should
be good enough.
signature.asc
Description:
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:22:08AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang
> Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 14:57:52 +0200
>
> >> Series applied.
> >
> > Could you make a small immutable branch for me to pull into my I2C tree?
> > I have some changes for i2c.h pending and want to minimize merge
From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 14:57:52 +0200
>> Series applied.
>
> Could you make a small immutable branch for me to pull into my I2C tree?
> I have some changes for i2c.h pending and want to minimize merge
> conflicts.
I already put other changes into net-next and also just
Hi David,
> Series applied.
Could you make a small immutable branch for me to pull into my I2C tree?
I have some changes for i2c.h pending and want to minimize merge
conflicts.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> Maybe he can create a smaller immutable branch for you.
Yeah, that's what I was basically asking for, but probably should reply
to his mail.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 08:48:42AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > > Are you happy for the i2c patch to be merged via net-next?
> >
> > Yes, that's fine my me.
> >
> > Wolfram do you have any objections?
>
> That's fine with me, I'd like an immutable branch, though. There are
> likely other
> > Are you happy for the i2c patch to be merged via net-next?
>
> Yes, that's fine my me.
>
> Wolfram do you have any objections?
That's fine with me, I'd like an immutable branch, though. There are
likely other changes to i2c.h coming and that would avoid merge
conflicts.
signature.asc
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 05:51:32PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 12:48:18PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:02:31PM -0700, Ruslan Babayev wrote:
> > > Changes:
> > > v2:
> > > - more descriptive commit body
> > > v3:
> > > - made
From: Ruslan Babayev
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 16:02:31 -0700
> Changes:
> v2:
> - more descriptive commit body
> v3:
> - made 'i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle' static inline
> v4:
> - don't initialize i2c_adapter to NULL. Instead see below...
> - handle the case of neither
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 12:48:18PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:02:31PM -0700, Ruslan Babayev wrote:
> > Changes:
> > v2:
> > - more descriptive commit body
> > v3:
> > - made 'i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle' static inline
> > v4:
> > - don't initialize
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:02:31PM -0700, Ruslan Babayev wrote:
> Changes:
> v2:
> - more descriptive commit body
> v3:
> - made 'i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle' static inline
> v4:
> - don't initialize i2c_adapter to NULL. Instead see below...
> - handle the case of
Changes:
v2:
- more descriptive commit body
v3:
- made 'i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle' static inline
v4:
- don't initialize i2c_adapter to NULL. Instead see below...
- handle the case of neither DT nor ACPI present as invalid.
- alphabetical includes.
12 matches
Mail list logo
