On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 14:23:23 -0700
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 21:51:49 +0100
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> > I sounds like Daniel (see other email) have bigger plans for what
> > Documentation/BPF/ should contain. E.g. consolidating
> >
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 14:23:23 -0700
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 21:51:49 +0100
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> > I sounds like Daniel (see other email) have bigger plans for what
> > Documentation/BPF/ should contain. E.g. consolidating
> >
On 02/07/2017 10:19 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:43:38 +0100
Daniel Borkmann wrote:
Hi Jesper,
On 02/07/2017 03:30 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it
On 02/07/2017 10:19 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:43:38 +0100
Daniel Borkmann wrote:
Hi Jesper,
On 02/07/2017 03:30 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here???
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 21:51:49 +0100
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> I sounds like Daniel (see other email) have bigger plans for what
> Documentation/BPF/ should contain. E.g. consolidating
> Documentation/networking/filter.txt which covers the cBPF/eBPF internals.
> If that is
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 21:51:49 +0100
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> I sounds like Daniel (see other email) have bigger plans for what
> Documentation/BPF/ should contain. E.g. consolidating
> Documentation/networking/filter.txt which covers the cBPF/eBPF internals.
> If that is the case (and I
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:43:38 +0100
Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Hi Jesper,
>
> On 02/07/2017 03:30 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
> >
> > If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here???
> >
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:43:38 +0100
Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Hi Jesper,
>
> On 02/07/2017 03:30 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
> >
> > If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here???
> >
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:46:08 -0700
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:09:08 +0100
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> > > > Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
> > > >
> > > > If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:46:08 -0700
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:09:08 +0100
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> > > > Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
> > > >
> > > > If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here???
> > > >
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:09:08 +0100
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
> > >
> > > If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here???
> > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
>
> What about this question?
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:09:08 +0100
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
> > >
> > > If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here???
> > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
>
> What about this question? Or let me ask in
Hi Jesper,
On 02/07/2017 03:30 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here???
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
If it will not appear sooner that way, then it's likely best to keep
it
Hi Jesper,
On 02/07/2017 03:30 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here???
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
If it will not appear sooner that way, then it's likely best to keep
it
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:37:17 -0700
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 15:30:11 +0100
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> > Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
> >
> > If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here???
> >
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:37:17 -0700
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 15:30:11 +0100
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> > Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
> >
> > If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here???
> >
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 15:30:11 +0100
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
>
> If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here???
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
> If it will not appear sooner that way, then
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 15:30:11 +0100
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
>
> If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here???
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
> If it will not appear sooner that way, then it's likely best to
Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here???
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
If it will not appear sooner that way, then it's likely best to keep
it in sync with the tree that takes eBPF code changes.
This marks the
Question: What kernel tree should this go into???
If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here???
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
If it will not appear sooner that way, then it's likely best to keep
it in sync with the tree that takes eBPF code changes.
This marks the
20 matches
Mail list logo