Rasmus,
I think it is worth it to clarify this even if you already understood it
yourself - other readers of linux-kernel may find it useful (and those who
find it too obvious will forgive me).
The concept of Linux subsystem maintainer doesn't mean that _any_ changes
to his subsystem should go t
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Rasmus Andersen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per your
> suggestion to Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo). This impacts bfs as per
> the following patch.
>
Rasmus, thanks of course, but this idea _only_ makes sense if you produce
a big patch
Hi.
I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per your
suggestion to Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo). This impacts bfs as per
the following patch.
diff -u --recursive -X misc/dontdiff linux-240test8-pre2/fs/bfs/dir.c
linux/fs/bfs/dir.c
--- linux-240test8-pre2/fs/bfs/dir.cThu Aug 24 0
3 matches
Mail list logo