Re: [patch] dac960: return success instead of -ENOTTY

On 2013-01-11 07:52, Dan Carpenter wrote: > There is a missing break statement here. This used to return directly > but we re-worked it in 2008 to add locking as part of the BKL push down. Thanks Dan, applied. Must have a big user base... -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send th

[patch] dac960: return success instead of -ENOTTY

There is a missing break statement here. This used to return directly but we re-worked it in 2008 to add locking as part of the BKL push down. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter diff --git a/drivers/block/DAC960.c b/drivers/block/DAC960.c index 9a13e88..0d3ffc5 100644 --- a/drivers/block/DAC960.c +++