On Friday 05 August 2005 22:04, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Dominik Karall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With FRAME_POINTERS enabled:
> >
> > BUG: mono[3193] exited with nonzero preempt_count 1!
> > ---
> >
> > | preempt count: 0001 ]
> > | 1 level deep critical section nest
here's a full patch again of all things preempt-trace (excludes the sysv
semaphores change):
this patch implements the "non-preemptible section trace" feature, which
prints out a "critical section nesting" trace after stackdumps:
Call Trace:
[] show_stack+0x7a/0x90
[] show_regist
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > please enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS!
>
> Seems a bit tricky. Wouldn't it be best if enabling
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT autoselected CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL,
> CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER and whatever else we need?
ok, agreed:
-
when DEBUG_PREEMPT is enab
* Dominik Karall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With FRAME_POINTERS enabled:
>
> BUG: mono[3193] exited with nonzero preempt_count 1!
> ---
> | preempt count: 0001 ]
> | 1 level deep critical section nesting:
>
> .. [] _spin
On Friday 05 August 2005 20:46, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Dominik Karall wrote:
> > On Friday 05 August 2005 17:22, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > please enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS!
> >
> > I'm sorry, but I think I can't enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS.
> > Depends on: DEBUG_KERNEL && (X86
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Dominik Karall wrote:
> On Friday 05 August 2005 17:22, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > please enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS!
>
> I'm sorry, but I think I can't enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS.
> Depends on: DEBUG_KERNEL && (X86 && !X86_64 || CRIS || M68K || M68KNOMMU ||
> FRV || UML)
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> * Dominik Karall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > BUG: mono[10011] exited with nonzero preempt_count 1!
> > ---
> > | preempt count: 0001 ]
> > | 1 level deep critical section nesting:
> > ---
On Friday 05 August 2005 17:22, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Dominik Karall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BUG: mono[10011] exited with nonzero preempt_count 1!
> > ---
> >
> > | preempt count: 0001 ]
> > | 1 level deep critical section nesting:
> >
> > ---
* Dominik Karall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BUG: mono[10011] exited with nonzero preempt_count 1!
> ---
> | preempt count: 0001 ]
> | 1 level deep critical section nesting:
>
> .. [] _spin_lock+0xe/0x70
> .[<0
On Friday 05 August 2005 12:48, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think Ingo was planning on coming up with some infrastructure which
> > would allow us to debug this further.
>
> yeah. I've done this today and have split it out of the -RT tree, see
> the patch b
On Friday 05 August 2005 12:48, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think Ingo was planning on coming up with some infrastructure which
> > would allow us to debug this further.
>
> yeah. I've done this today and have split it out of the -RT tree, see
> the patch b
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think Ingo was planning on coming up with some infrastructure which
> would allow us to debug this further.
yeah. I've done this today and have split it out of the -RT tree, see
the patch below. After some exposure in -mm i'd like this feature to
12 matches
Mail list logo
