Re: [patch] smbfs does not support LFS (2.4.1-ac18)

2001-02-18 Thread Alan Cox
> Is it ok to at mount time set it to non-LFS and then later change it to be > something larger? smbfs doesn't actually know what the server and smbmount > negotiates until later, but no smbfs operation can take place before that > anyway. You can change it per superblock later at the moment. Its

[patch] smbfs does not support LFS (2.4.1-ac18)

2001-02-18 Thread Urban Widmark
Hello Unless I misunderstand s_maxbytes it says how large a file can be on the fs. I assume it is enough for a fs to set that and then it knows the vfs will not ask it to go beyond that limit? Is it ok to at mount time set it to non-LFS and then later change it to be something larger? smbfs doe