Re: [patch 0/2] s390 related scheduler patches and questions

2007-08-23 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Christian Borntraeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another question: > > nanosecond resolution seems not ideal for 64bit values, at least if an > architecture has to do calculations. For example our cpu timer is > signed 64bit and bit 51 (63=LSB) steps by one each microsecond. To > create a

[patch 0/2] s390 related scheduler patches and questions

2007-08-23 Thread Christian Borntraeger
Hello Ingo, Thanks you for applying the accouting fix. I looked into Jans sched_clock prototype, and here is an update for sched_clock on s390. This patch applies on current git, but should not go in before 2.6.23 as this change is not trivial. The patch itself is independent from other patches