What is the status of 2.6.20.10/11?
I have been using the 2.6.20.10-rc1 with great success, but now I see
2.6.20.10 has been release with only two patches, and no 2.6.20.11
with the 2.6.20.10-rc1 patchset?
I haven't seen much on the list about this..
Thanks, Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this lis
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Bryan WU wrote:
>
> You know, because the kernel development is so active and so many stable
> versions release, it is very hard to decide use which version for mass
> production, especially some embedded systems which does not often
> upgrade.
I actually think that one of
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 02:46:16PM +0800, Bryan WU wrote:
>
> You know, because the kernel development is so active and so many stable
> versions release, it is very hard to decide use which version for mass
> production, especially some embedded systems which does not often
> upgrade.
It is dif
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 22:48 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:21:24PM +0800, Bryan WU wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 08:13 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:15:54PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You know for some customer's product, they want to us
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:21:24PM +0800, Bryan WU wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 08:13 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:15:54PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> > >
> > > You know for some customer's product, they want to use the stable and
> > > long term support kernel instead to u
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 08:13 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:15:54PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> >
> > You know for some customer's product, they want to use the stable and
> > long term support kernel instead to use the latest one.
>
> Then they should get that support from a ve
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:15:54PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
>
> You know for some customer's product, they want to use the stable and
> long term support kernel instead to use the latest one.
Then they should get that support from a vendor, not from the kernel.org
releases :)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> The normal way -stable works is that it tracks the latest 2.6.x kernel
> that has been released.
> Now that 2.6.21 has been released, a final flush of the patch queue
> against 2.6.20 is done, that will be 2.6.20.10, and then -stable will
> switch to 2.6.21.y, when 2.6.22 co
On 27/04/07, Wu, Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 09:54 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.20.10 release.
> There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
> this one. If anyone has any issues with these
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 09:54 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.20.10 release.
> There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
> this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
> us know. If anyone is
Greg KH wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.20.10 release.
> There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
> this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
> us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsyste
* Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:48:22AM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> > any idea why there are so many more -stable patches for 2.6.20? this is
> > the
> > 10th -stable series, and most of them have been dozens of patches.
> >
> > is there a new team reporting a
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:48:22AM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> any idea why there are so many more -stable patches for 2.6.20? this is the
> 10th -stable series, and most of them have been dozens of patches.
>
> is there a new team reporting and fixing bugs? or were there just more small
> pr
any idea why there are so many more -stable patches for 2.6.20? this is the 10th
-stable series, and most of them have been dozens of patches.
is there a new team reporting and fixing bugs? or were there just more small
problems found in 2.6.20 then normal? or something else?
David Lang
On T
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:54:45AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.20.10 release.
> There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
> this one.
A full all-in-one patch can be found at:
kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.20.10 release.
There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
to add a S
16 matches
Mail list logo
