Re: [patch 00/34] idle: Consolidate idle implementations

2013-05-03 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Thomas, On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Each architecture implements its own cpu_idle() code, which is more or > less the same on all architectures (plus/minus a few bugs and a few > missing extra functionalities, instrumentation ...). That also forces > everyone

Re: [patch 00/34] idle: Consolidate idle implementations

2013-05-03 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Thomas, On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote: Each architecture implements its own cpu_idle() code, which is more or less the same on all architectures (plus/minus a few bugs and a few missing extra functionalities, instrumentation ...). That also

Re: [patch 00/34] idle: Consolidate idle implementations

2013-03-29 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 09:52:56PM -, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Each architecture implements its own cpu_idle() code, which is more or > less the same on all architectures (plus/minus a few bugs and a few > missing extra functionalities, instrumentation ...). That also forces > everyone who is

Re: [patch 00/34] idle: Consolidate idle implementations

2013-03-29 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 09:52:56PM -, Thomas Gleixner wrote: Each architecture implements its own cpu_idle() code, which is more or less the same on all architectures (plus/minus a few bugs and a few missing extra functionalities, instrumentation ...). That also forces everyone who is

Re: [patch 00/34] idle: Consolidate idle implementations

2013-03-28 Thread Chris Zankel
Hi Thomas, On 3/28/13 2:24 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Chris Zankel wrote: For Xtensa: Acked-by: Chris Zankel Thanks for going the extra mile and test-compiling it. Though, the build fails later with: arch/xtensa/kernel/built-in.o:(.init.literal+0x90): undefined

Re: [patch 00/34] idle: Consolidate idle implementations

2013-03-28 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Chris Zankel wrote: > For Xtensa: > Acked-by: Chris Zankel > > Thanks for going the extra mile and test-compiling it. Though, the build fails later with: arch/xtensa/kernel/built-in.o:(.init.literal+0x90): undefined reference to `platform_pcibios_init'

Re: [patch 00/34] idle: Consolidate idle implementations

2013-03-28 Thread Chris Zankel
Hi Thomas, On 3/28/13 2:24 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Chris Zankel wrote: For Xtensa: Acked-by: Chris Zankel ch...@zankel.net Thanks for going the extra mile and test-compiling it. Though, the build fails later with: arch/xtensa/kernel/built-in.o:(.init.literal+0x90):

Re: [patch 00/34] idle: Consolidate idle implementations

2013-03-28 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Chris Zankel wrote: For Xtensa: Acked-by: Chris Zankel ch...@zankel.net Thanks for going the extra mile and test-compiling it. Though, the build fails later with: arch/xtensa/kernel/built-in.o:(.init.literal+0x90): undefined reference to `platform_pcibios_init'

Re: [patch 00/34] idle: Consolidate idle implementations

2013-03-22 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Thomas. On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 09:52:56PM -, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Each architecture implements its own cpu_idle() code, which is more or > less the same on all architectures (plus/minus a few bugs and a few > missing extra functionalities, instrumentation ...). That also forces >

Re: [patch 00/34] idle: Consolidate idle implementations

2013-03-22 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Thomas. On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 09:52:56PM -, Thomas Gleixner wrote: Each architecture implements its own cpu_idle() code, which is more or less the same on all architectures (plus/minus a few bugs and a few missing extra functionalities, instrumentation ...). That also forces everyone

[patch 00/34] idle: Consolidate idle implementations

2013-03-21 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Each architecture implements its own cpu_idle() code, which is more or less the same on all architectures (plus/minus a few bugs and a few missing extra functionalities, instrumentation ...). That also forces everyone who is interested in idle related features to add new functionality to every

[patch 00/34] idle: Consolidate idle implementations

2013-03-21 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Each architecture implements its own cpu_idle() code, which is more or less the same on all architectures (plus/minus a few bugs and a few missing extra functionalities, instrumentation ...). That also forces everyone who is interested in idle related features to add new functionality to every