Re: [patch 00/35] net: in_interrupt() cleanup and fixes

2020-09-28 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sun, Sep 27 2020 at 13:57, David Miller wrote: > From: Thomas Gleixner > Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 21:48:46 +0200 > >> in the discussion about preempt count consistency accross kernel >> configurations: > > Please respin this against net-next, some of the patches in here are already > in

Re: [patch 00/35] net: in_interrupt() cleanup and fixes

2020-09-27 Thread David Miller
From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 21:48:46 +0200 > in the discussion about preempt count consistency accross kernel > configurations: Please respin this against net-next, some of the patches in here are already in net-next (the wireless debug macro one) and even after that the

Re: [patch 00/35] net: in_interrupt() cleanup and fixes

2020-09-27 Thread Joe Perches
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 21:48 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Folks, > > in the discussion about preempt count consistency accross kernel > configurations: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914204209.256266...@linutronix.de/ > > Linus clearly requested that code in drivers and libraries which

[patch 00/35] net: in_interrupt() cleanup and fixes

2020-09-27 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Folks, in the discussion about preempt count consistency accross kernel configurations: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914204209.256266...@linutronix.de/ Linus clearly requested that code in drivers and libraries which changes behaviour based on execution context should either be split up so