Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-02-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:01:03PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote: >... > Adrian, this should also apply against 2.6.16.y Thanks, applied. > Thank you, > > Michael Krufky >... cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been

Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-02-21 Thread Michael Krufky
Michael Krufky wrote: > Greg KH wrote: >> Ok, I've now gotten all of these for .19 and .18. >> >> If I've missed anything, please let me know. >> >> thanks for your patience. > > Looks good... Thank you, Greg. > > Greg KH wrote: >> This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable serie

Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-02-20 Thread Michael Krufky
Greg KH wrote: > Ok, I've now gotten all of these for .19 and .18. > > If I've missed anything, please let me know. > > thanks for your patience. Looks good... Thank you, Greg. Greg KH wrote: > This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so > if there are patches that yo

Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-02-20 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 02:41:05PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote: > > Michael Krufky wrote: > > > Greg KH wrote: > > > > > I'll go through the archives and see if there's enough to do a .18 > > release (and the patches are serious

Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-02-09 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 02:41:05PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote: > Michael Krufky wrote: > > Greg KH wrote: > > > I'll go through the archives and see if there's enough to do a .18 > release (and the patches are serious enough to warrent it.) > >>> Actually, I have a few more -stable patc

Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-02-09 Thread Michael Krufky
Michael Krufky wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > I'll go through the archives and see if there's enough to do a .18 release (and the patches are serious enough to warrent it.) >>> Actually, I have a few more -stable patches for both 2.6.18.y and 2.6.19.y, >>> if >>> you don't mind holding off a

Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-02-07 Thread Michael Krufky
Greg KH wrote: >>> I'll go through the archives and see if there's enough to do a .18 >>> release (and the patches are serious enough to warrent it.) >> Actually, I have a few more -stable patches for both 2.6.18.y and 2.6.19.y, >> if >> you don't mind holding off a day or two (wont have time to

Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-02-05 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:16:11PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote: > >> Chris Wright wrote: > >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.2 release. > >>> There are 50 patches in this series, all w

Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-02-05 Thread Michael Krufky
Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote: >> Chris Wright wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.2 release. >>> There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues wit

Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-02-05 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 02:12:33PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote: > * Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote: > > > At which point was 2.6.18.y dropped? I thought we were always going to > > > keep > > > the last two stable kernels up-to-

Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-02-05 Thread Chris Wright
* Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote: > > At which point was 2.6.18.y dropped? I thought we were always going to keep > > the last two stable kernels up-to-date. Not quite. It's more of a "some overlap," so that as soon as 2.6.x co

Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-02-05 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote: > Chris Wright wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.2 release. > > There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being appl

Re: [patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-02-04 Thread Michael Krufky
Chris Wright wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.2 release. > There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subs

Re: [patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-01-05 Thread Chris Wright
rollup available (when mirroring completes): http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/chrisw/stable/patch-2.6.19.2-rc1.{gz,bz2} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger

[patch 00/50] -stable review

2007-01-05 Thread Chris Wright
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.2 release. There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants to add a Si