On Thu 05-07-12 02:44:56, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Not all uncharge paths need to check if the page is swapcache, some of
> them can know for sure.
>
> Push down the check into all callsites of uncharge_common() so that
> the patch that removes some of them is more obvious.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:42:12AM +0900, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
> (2012/07/05 9:44), Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > @@ -3278,10 +3283,11 @@ void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct mem_cgroup
> > *memcg,
> > unused = oldpage;
> > }
> > anon = PageAnon(used);
> > -
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:42:12AM +0900, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
(2012/07/05 9:44), Johannes Weiner wrote:
@@ -3278,10 +3283,11 @@ void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct mem_cgroup
*memcg,
unused = oldpage;
}
anon = PageAnon(used);
-
On Thu 05-07-12 02:44:56, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Not all uncharge paths need to check if the page is swapcache, some of
them can know for sure.
Push down the check into all callsites of uncharge_common() so that
the patch that removes some of them is more obvious.
Signed-off-by: Johannes
(2012/07/05 9:44), Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Not all uncharge paths need to check if the page is swapcache, some of
> them can know for sure.
>
> Push down the check into all callsites of uncharge_common() so that
> the patch that removes some of them is more obvious.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes
(2012/07/05 9:44), Johannes Weiner wrote:
Not all uncharge paths need to check if the page is swapcache, some of
them can know for sure.
Push down the check into all callsites of uncharge_common() so that
the patch that removes some of them is more obvious.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
6 matches
Mail list logo
