> hm. At no point in this patch series does anything actually get added to
> these lists, so this patch is presently a no-op.
>
> I'll assume that it will get used later. But it is a bit odd to add
> infrastructure in a patch series, then not use it. Why not hold the patch
> back and include
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:50:35 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Each WRITE request must carry a valid file descriptor. When a page is
> written back from a memory mapping, the file through which the page
> was dirtied is not available,
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:50:35 +0200
Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Each WRITE request must carry a valid file descriptor. When a page is
written back from a memory mapping, the file through which the page
was dirtied is not available, so a new
hm. At no point in this patch series does anything actually get added to
these lists, so this patch is presently a no-op.
I'll assume that it will get used later. But it is a bit odd to add
infrastructure in a patch series, then not use it. Why not hold the patch
back and include it in
From: Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Each WRITE request must carry a valid file descriptor. When a page is
written back from a memory mapping, the file through which the page
was dirtied is not available, so a new mechananism is needed to find a
suitable file in ->writepage(s).
A list of
From: Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Each WRITE request must carry a valid file descriptor. When a page is
written back from a memory mapping, the file through which the page
was dirtied is not available, so a new mechananism is needed to find a
suitable file in -writepage(s).
A list of
6 matches
Mail list logo
