On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 05:05:09PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:40:34AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> > David Chinner wrote:
> > > I think we can remove xfs_bulkstat_one_compat() completely by using
> > > the same method you used with the xfs_inumber_fmt functions.
> >
>
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:40:34AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> David Chinner wrote:
> > I think we can remove xfs_bulkstat_one_compat() completely by using
> > the same method you used with the xfs_inumber_fmt functions.
>
> You mean xfs_ioc_bulkstat_compat() -> native xfs_bulkstat() -> native
>
David Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 03:25:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> +static int xfs_bulkstat_one_compat(
>> +xfs_mount_t *mp,/* mount point for filesystem */
>> +xfs_ino_t ino,/* inode number to get data for */
>> +void
David Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 03:25:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static int xfs_bulkstat_one_compat(
+xfs_mount_t *mp,/* mount point for filesystem */
+xfs_ino_t ino,/* inode number to get data for */
+void
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:40:34AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
David Chinner wrote:
I think we can remove xfs_bulkstat_one_compat() completely by using
the same method you used with the xfs_inumber_fmt functions.
You mean xfs_ioc_bulkstat_compat() - native xfs_bulkstat() - native
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 05:05:09PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:40:34AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
David Chinner wrote:
I think we can remove xfs_bulkstat_one_compat() completely by using
the same method you used with the xfs_inumber_fmt functions.
You mean
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 11:15:30AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> CC fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.o
> fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c: In function ‘xfs_ioc_bulkstat_compat’:
> fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c:334: error: ‘xfs_inumbers_fmt_compat’
> undeclared (first use in this function)
>
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 11:15:30AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
CC fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.o
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c: In function ‘xfs_ioc_bulkstat_compat’:
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c:334: error: ‘xfs_inumbers_fmt_compat’
undeclared (first use in this function)
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:25:52 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * 32bit struct xfs_fsop_bulkreq has different size and layout of
> members, no matter the alignment. Move the code out of the #else
> branch (why was it there in the first place?). Define _32 variants of
> the ioctl constants.
>
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:25:52 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* 32bit struct xfs_fsop_bulkreq has different size and layout of
members, no matter the alignment. Move the code out of the #else
branch (why was it there in the first place?). Define _32 variants of
the ioctl constants.
*
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 03:25:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * 32bit struct xfs_fsop_bulkreq has different size and layout of
> members, no matter the alignment. Move the code out of the #else
> branch (why was it there in the first place?). Define _32 variants of
> the ioctl
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 03:25:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* 32bit struct xfs_fsop_bulkreq has different size and layout of
members, no matter the alignment. Move the code out of the #else
branch (why was it there in the first place?). Define _32 variants of
the ioctl constants.
* 32bit struct xfs_fsop_bulkreq has different size and layout of
members, no matter the alignment. Move the code out of the #else
branch (why was it there in the first place?). Define _32 variants of
the ioctl constants.
* 32bit struct xfs_bstat is different because of time_t and on
i386
* 32bit struct xfs_fsop_bulkreq has different size and layout of
members, no matter the alignment. Move the code out of the #else
branch (why was it there in the first place?). Define _32 variants of
the ioctl constants.
* 32bit struct xfs_bstat is different because of time_t and on
i386
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:52:14AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> David Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:59:57PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> >> +typedef struct xfs_bstat32 {
...
> >> +}
> >> +#ifdef BROKEN_X86_ALIGNMENT
> >> + __attribute__((packed))
> >> +#endif
> >> +
David Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:59:57PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>> +typedef struct xfs_bstat32 {
>> +__u64 bs_ino; /* inode number */
>> +__u16 bs_mode;/* type and mode*/
>> +__u16
On Wednesday 30 May 2007, Michal Marek wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c
> @@ -109,35 +109,249 @@ STATIC unsigned long xfs_ioctl32_geom_v1
> return (unsigned long)p;
> }
>
> -#else
> +typedef struct xfs_inogrp32 {
> +
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:59:57PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> * 32bit struct xfs_fsop_bulkreq has different size and layout of
> members, no matter the alignment. Move the code out of the #else
> branch (why was it there in the first place?). Define _32 variants of
> the ioctl constants.
>
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:59:57PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
* 32bit struct xfs_fsop_bulkreq has different size and layout of
members, no matter the alignment. Move the code out of the #else
branch (why was it there in the first place?). Define _32 variants of
the ioctl constants.
*
On Wednesday 30 May 2007, Michal Marek wrote:
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c
@@ -109,35 +109,249 @@ STATIC unsigned long xfs_ioctl32_geom_v1
return (unsigned long)p;
}
-#else
+typedef struct xfs_inogrp32 {
+
David Chinner wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:59:57PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
+typedef struct xfs_bstat32 {
+__u64 bs_ino; /* inode number */
+__u16 bs_mode;/* type and mode*/
+__u16 bs_nlink;
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:52:14AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
David Chinner wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:59:57PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
+typedef struct xfs_bstat32 {
...
+}
+#ifdef BROKEN_X86_ALIGNMENT
+ __attribute__((packed))
+#endif
+ xfs_bstat32_t;
#ifdef
* 32bit struct xfs_fsop_bulkreq has different size and layout of
members, no matter the alignment. Move the code out of the #else
branch (why was it there in the first place?). Define _32 variants of
the ioctl constants.
* 32bit struct xfs_bstat is different on 32bit (because of time_t and
* 32bit struct xfs_fsop_bulkreq has different size and layout of
members, no matter the alignment. Move the code out of the #else
branch (why was it there in the first place?). Define _32 variants of
the ioctl constants.
* 32bit struct xfs_bstat is different on 32bit (because of time_t and
24 matches
Mail list logo
