* Peter Osterlund ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > a) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-gnu-utils/1999-06/msg00183.html
>
> Why does this 6 year old bug have to be fixed in the 2.6.12 stable
> series? Doesn't the patch violate this stable series rule?
>
>
Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> --
>
> a) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-gnu-utils/1999-06/msg00183.html
Why does this 6 year old bug have to be fixed in the 2.6.12 stable
series? Doesn't the
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
a) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-gnu-utils/1999-06/msg00183.html
b) http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94584
Signed-off-by: Tim Yamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Tavis Ormandy <[EMAIL PROTE
3 matches
Mail list logo