Re: [patch 4/8] [PATCH] Update in-kernel zlib routines

2005-08-11 Thread Chris Wright
* Peter Osterlund ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > a) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-gnu-utils/1999-06/msg00183.html > > Why does this 6 year old bug have to be fixed in the 2.6.12 stable > series? Doesn't the patch violate this stable series rule? > >

Re: [patch 4/8] [PATCH] Update in-kernel zlib routines

2005-08-11 Thread Peter Osterlund
Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > -- > > a) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-gnu-utils/1999-06/msg00183.html Why does this 6 year old bug have to be fixed in the 2.6.12 stable series? Doesn't the

[patch 4/8] [PATCH] Update in-kernel zlib routines

2005-08-11 Thread Chris Wright
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- a) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-gnu-utils/1999-06/msg00183.html b) http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94584 Signed-off-by: Tim Yamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Tavis Ormandy <[EMAIL PROTE