Re: [prink] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/1

2014-05-30 Thread Sasha Levin
On 05/30/2014 01:24 PM, Jan Kara wrote: > Now with the attachment... :) Jan, I suspect that the issue Jet has reported is different from mine. Your patch (or even removing all of print_PIC() didn't solve the issue I've reported. Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [prink] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/1

2014-05-30 Thread Jan Kara
Now with the attachment... :) On Fri 30-05-14 19:23:27, Jan Kara wrote: > On Fri 30-05-14 18:58:10, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Fri 30-05-14 18:19:48, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:16:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:50:51PM +0200, Jan

Re: [prink] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/1

2014-05-30 Thread Jan Kara
On Fri 30-05-14 18:58:10, Jan Kara wrote: > On Fri 30-05-14 18:19:48, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:16:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:50:51PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > > > [7.492350]

Re: [prink] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/1

2014-05-30 Thread Jan Kara
On Fri 30-05-14 18:19:48, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:16:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:50:51PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > > [7.492350] == > > > > [7.492350] [ INFO: possible

Re: [prink] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/1

2014-05-30 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:16:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:50:51PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > [7.492350] == > > > [7.492350] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] > > > [7.492350]

Re: [prink] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/1

2014-05-30 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:50:51PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > [7.492350] == > > [7.492350] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] > > [7.492350] 3.15.0-rc5-00567-gbafe980 #1 Not tainted > > [7.492350]

Re: [prink] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/1

2014-05-30 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:50:51PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: [7.492350] == [7.492350] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [7.492350] 3.15.0-rc5-00567-gbafe980 #1 Not tainted [7.492350]

Re: [prink] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/1

2014-05-30 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:16:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:50:51PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: [7.492350] == [7.492350] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [7.492350]

Re: [prink] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/1

2014-05-30 Thread Jan Kara
On Fri 30-05-14 18:19:48, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:16:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:50:51PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: [7.492350] == [7.492350] [ INFO: possible circular

Re: [prink] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/1

2014-05-30 Thread Jan Kara
On Fri 30-05-14 18:58:10, Jan Kara wrote: On Fri 30-05-14 18:19:48, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:16:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:50:51PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: [7.492350] ==

Re: [prink] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/1

2014-05-30 Thread Jan Kara
Now with the attachment... :) On Fri 30-05-14 19:23:27, Jan Kara wrote: On Fri 30-05-14 18:58:10, Jan Kara wrote: On Fri 30-05-14 18:19:48, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:16:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:50:51PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:

Re: [prink] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/1

2014-05-30 Thread Sasha Levin
On 05/30/2014 01:24 PM, Jan Kara wrote: Now with the attachment... :) Jan, I suspect that the issue Jet has reported is different from mine. Your patch (or even removing all of print_PIC() didn't solve the issue I've reported. Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line