Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: VM brokenness, possibly related to reiserfs

2001-02-03 Thread David Ford
Chris Mason wrote: > > On Thursday, February 01, 2001 02:16:43 PM -0200 Rik van Riel ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> About the system hanging completely, I wonder if it goes >> away by pressing sysrq-S (sync all disks). If it does, >> maybe Reiserfs was blocking all the pages in the inactive

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: VM brokenness, possibly related to reiserfs

2001-02-03 Thread David Ford
Chris Mason wrote: On Thursday, February 01, 2001 02:16:43 PM -0200 Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: About the system hanging completely, I wonder if it goes away by pressing sysrq-S (sync all disks). If it does, maybe Reiserfs was blocking all the pages in the inactive list from

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: VM brokenness, possibly related to reiserfs

2001-02-01 Thread David Ford
My apologies...my internic data isn't updated, http://208.179.0.18/VM/ -d -- There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum - To

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: VM brokenness, possibly related to reiserfs

2001-02-01 Thread David Ford
Chris Mason wrote: > Sorry, can't seem to resolve stuph.org. What is kreiserfsd doing during when the >system is waiting for more ram? With JOURNAL_MAX_BATCH set to 100, kreiserfsd will >end up responsible for sending log blocks/metadata to disk and freeing the pinned >buffers. > > -chris

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: VM brokenness, possibly related to reiserfs

2001-02-01 Thread David Ford
My apologies...my internic data isn't updated, http://208.179.0.18/VM/ -d -- There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum - To

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: VM brokenness, possibly related to reiserfs

2001-02-01 Thread Chris Mason
On Thursday, February 01, 2001 02:16:43 PM -0200 Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > About the system hanging completely, I wonder if it goes > away by pressing sysrq-S (sync all disks). If it does, > maybe Reiserfs was blocking all the pages in the inactive > list from being written

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: VM brokenness, possibly related to reiserfs

2001-02-01 Thread Chris Mason
On Thursday, February 01, 2001 02:16:43 PM -0200 Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: About the system hanging completely, I wonder if it goes away by pressing sysrq-S (sync all disks). If it does, maybe Reiserfs was blocking all the pages in the inactive list from being written

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: VM brokenness, possibly related to reiserfs

2001-02-01 Thread David Ford
My apologies...my internic data isn't updated, http://208.179.0.18/VM/ -d -- There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum - To

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: VM brokenness, possibly related to reiserfs

2001-02-01 Thread David Ford
Chris Mason wrote: Sorry, can't seem to resolve stuph.org. What is kreiserfsd doing during when the system is waiting for more ram? With JOURNAL_MAX_BATCH set to 100, kreiserfsd will end up responsible for sending log blocks/metadata to disk and freeing the pinned buffers. -chris

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: VM brokenness, possibly related to reiserfs

2001-02-01 Thread David Ford
My apologies...my internic data isn't updated, http://208.179.0.18/VM/ -d -- There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum - To