Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS seems to be stable as of 2.4.4

Dirk Mueller wrote: > > Now consider a good amount of fragmentation because those files get created > over time (weeks, months etc). and you quickly degenerade to a scanning > speed of maybe 10-20 files per second (Athlon 800, IBM 60GB HD with roughly > 35MB/s linear read). It was that horrible

Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS seems to be stable as of 2.4.4

Dirk Mueller wrote: Now consider a good amount of fragmentation because those files get created over time (weeks, months etc). and you quickly degenerade to a scanning speed of maybe 10-20 files per second (Athlon 800, IBM 60GB HD with roughly 35MB/s linear read). It was that horrible that