On Tue 2008-02-05 17:51:22, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> The asm() for making beeps really need to be moved to a function and
>>> cleaned up (redone in C using inb()/outb()) if they are to be retained at
>>> all.
>>
>> Yes, they are. For some people they're the only tool
On Tue 2008-02-05 17:51:22, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
The asm() for making beeps really need to be moved to a function and
cleaned up (redone in C using inb()/outb()) if they are to be retained at
all.
Yes, they are. For some people they're the only tool to debug
On Tuesday, 5 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
This rewrites wakeup code to .c, and it fixes stack (should use movl
,%esp, not movw). Testers wanted. Makefile infrastructure was done by
hpa, cleanups by rjw.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[--snip--]
diff --git
On Wednesday, 6 of February 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> The asm() for making beeps really need to be moved to a function and
> >> cleaned up (redone in C using inb()/outb()) if they are to be retained
> >> at all.
> >
> > Yes, they are. For some people they're
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
The asm() for making beeps really need to be moved to a function and
cleaned up (redone in C using inb()/outb()) if they are to be retained
at all.
Yes, they are. For some people they're the only tool to debug broken resume.
That's fine, but they should get cleaned
On Wednesday, 6 of February 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 5 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> This rewrites wakeup code to .c, and it fixes stack (should use movl
> >> ,%esp, not movw). Testers wanted. Makefile infrastructure was done by
> >> hpa,
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
This rewrites wakeup code to .c, and it fixes stack (should use movl
,%esp, not movw). Testers wanted. Makefile infrastructure was done by
hpa, cleanups by rjw.
I'll test it tomorrow and I still have some more
On Tuesday, 5 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> This rewrites wakeup code to .c, and it fixes stack (should use movl
> ,%esp, not movw). Testers wanted. Makefile infrastructure was done by
> hpa, cleanups by rjw.
I'll test it tomorrow and I still have some more cleanups (I was distracted
This rewrites wakeup code to .c, and it fixes stack (should use movl
,%esp, not movw). Testers wanted. Makefile infrastructure was done by
hpa, cleanups by rjw.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
index 8978e98..949b8eb 100644
---
This rewrites wakeup code to .c, and it fixes stack (should use movl
,%esp, not movw). Testers wanted. Makefile infrastructure was done by
hpa, cleanups by rjw.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
index 8978e98..949b8eb 100644
---
On Tuesday, 5 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
This rewrites wakeup code to .c, and it fixes stack (should use movl
,%esp, not movw). Testers wanted. Makefile infrastructure was done by
hpa, cleanups by rjw.
I'll test it tomorrow and I still have some more cleanups (I was distracted by
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
This rewrites wakeup code to .c, and it fixes stack (should use movl
,%esp, not movw). Testers wanted. Makefile infrastructure was done by
hpa, cleanups by rjw.
I'll test it tomorrow and I still have some more
On Wednesday, 6 of February 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
This rewrites wakeup code to .c, and it fixes stack (should use movl
,%esp, not movw). Testers wanted. Makefile infrastructure was done by
hpa, cleanups by
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
The asm() for making beeps really need to be moved to a function and
cleaned up (redone in C using inb()/outb()) if they are to be retained
at all.
Yes, they are. For some people they're the only tool to debug broken resume.
That's fine, but they should get cleaned
On Wednesday, 6 of February 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
The asm() for making beeps really need to be moved to a function and
cleaned up (redone in C using inb()/outb()) if they are to be retained
at all.
Yes, they are. For some people they're the only tool
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo