Re: [rtc-linux] Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem?

2013-12-21 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 09:23:46PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: > I do not even know to which specific component the irq line of the chip > is connected. You can take a look at [1] to see what's on the PCB; if > you have an idea about which one could be a good candidate (TPS65251?), > I can try

Re: [rtc-linux] Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem?

2013-12-21 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 09:23:46PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: I do not even know to which specific component the irq line of the chip is connected. You can take a look at [1] to see what's on the PCB; if you have an idea about which one could be a good candidate (TPS65251?), I can try and

Re: [rtc-linux] Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem?

2013-12-20 Thread Arnaud Ebalard
Hi, Mark Brown writes: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:17:44PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: > >> All NETGEAR ReadyNAS 102, 104 and 2120 have an ISL 12057 RTC chip which >> is used as main RTC clock but can also provide alarm. But the alarm >> interrupt line of the chip is *not* connected to the

Re: [rtc-linux] Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem?

2013-12-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:17:44PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: > All NETGEAR ReadyNAS 102, 104 and 2120 have an ISL 12057 RTC chip which > is used as main RTC clock but can also provide alarm. But the alarm > interrupt line of the chip is *not* connected to the SoC. It is > connected to some

Re: [rtc-linux] Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem?

2013-12-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:17:44PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: All NETGEAR ReadyNAS 102, 104 and 2120 have an ISL 12057 RTC chip which is used as main RTC clock but can also provide alarm. But the alarm interrupt line of the chip is *not* connected to the SoC. It is connected to some power

Re: [rtc-linux] Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem?

2013-12-20 Thread Arnaud Ebalard
Hi, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org writes: On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:17:44PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: All NETGEAR ReadyNAS 102, 104 and 2120 have an ISL 12057 RTC chip which is used as main RTC clock but can also provide alarm. But the alarm interrupt line of the chip is *not* connected

Re: [rtc-linux] Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem?

2013-12-19 Thread Arnaud Ebalard
Hi, Alessandro Zummo writes: > On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:46:24 -0500 > Jason Cooper wrote: > >> In the long term, should we seek out a co-maintainer for drivers/rtc? >> Can anyone get a hold of Alessandro to get his opinion on this? > > I'd surely appreciate if someone can take some time to give

Re: [rtc-linux] Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem?

2013-12-19 Thread Alessandro Zummo
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:46:24 -0500 Jason Cooper wrote: > In the long term, should we seek out a co-maintainer for drivers/rtc? > Can anyone get a hold of Alessandro to get his opinion on this? I'd surely appreciate if someone can take some time to give a look to the patches. Most of them go

Re: [rtc-linux] Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem?

2013-12-19 Thread Alessandro Zummo
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:46:24 -0500 Jason Cooper ja...@lakedaemon.net wrote: In the long term, should we seek out a co-maintainer for drivers/rtc? Can anyone get a hold of Alessandro to get his opinion on this? I'd surely appreciate if someone can take some time to give a look to the patches.

Re: [rtc-linux] Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem?

2013-12-19 Thread Arnaud Ebalard
Hi, Alessandro Zummo a.zu...@towertech.it writes: On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:46:24 -0500 Jason Cooper ja...@lakedaemon.net wrote: In the long term, should we seek out a co-maintainer for drivers/rtc? Can anyone get a hold of Alessandro to get his opinion on this? I'd surely appreciate if